Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25750061›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurobiology2015

Clinically Combating Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS) with Dopamine Agonist Therapy as a Paradigm Shift: Dopamine for Dinner?

Kenneth Blum, Marcelo Febo, Panayotis K Thanos, David Baron, James Fratantonio, Mark Gold

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Are We Getting High Cause the Thrill is Gone?Journal of addiction psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  6. Prenatal Effects of Nicotine on Obesity Risks: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS): A Cytoarchitectural Common Neurobiological Trait of All Addictions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kenneth BlumDepartment of Psychiatry and McKnight Brain Institute, College of Medicine, University of Florida, P. O. Box 100256, Gainesville, FL, 32610-0256, USA. drd2gene@gmail.com.
Marcelo FeboDepartment of Psychiatry and McKnight Brain Institute, College of Medicine, University of Florida, P. O. Box 100256, Gainesville, FL, 32610-0256, USA.
Panayotis K ThanosBehavior Neuropharmacology and Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychology, SUNY at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
David BaronDepartment of Psychiatry, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
James FratantonioDivision of Applied Clinical Research, Dominion Diagnostics, LLC, North Kingstown, RI, USA.
Mark GoldDepartment of Psychiatry and McKnight Brain Institute, College of Medicine, University of Florida, P. O. Box 100256, Gainesville, FL, 32610-0256, USA.

Funding

Skeletal Effects of MethylphenidateR01HD070888 · NICHD · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI KOMATSU, DAVID E · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
Brain Imaging of Cocaine and Maternal RewardR01DA019946 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI FEBO, MARCELO · 2007 to 2011
$1.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD070888NICHD NIH HHS R01HD70888-01A1NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA019946NIDA NIH HHS R01DA019946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Everyday, there are several millions of people that are increasingly unable to combat their frustrating and even fatal romance with getting high and/or experiencing "normal" feelings of well-being. In the USA, the FDA has approved pharmaceuticals for drug and alcohol abuse: tobacco and nicotine replacement therapy. The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) remarkably continue to provide an increasing understanding of the intricate functions of brain reward circuitry through sophisticated neuroimaging and molecular genetic applied technology. Similar work is intensely investigated on a worldwide basis with enhanced clarity and increased interaction between not only individual scientists but across many disciplines. However, while it is universally agreed that dopamine is a major neurotransmitter in terms of reward dependence, there remains controversy regarding how to modulate its role clinically to treat and prevent relapse for both substance and non-substance-related addictive behaviors. While the existing FDA-approved medications promote blocking dopamine, we argue that a more prudent paradigm shift should be biphasic-short-term blockade and long-term upregulation, enhancing functional connectivity of brain reward circuits.

Indexed as

RewardAnimalsBehavior, AddictiveBrainDopamineDopamine AgonistsHumansReceptors, Dopamine D2DopamineDopamine AgonistsReceptors, Dopamine D2Agonistic therapyDopamineDopamine societiesGenetics and epigeneticsReward deficiency syndrome (RDS)

Identifiers

PMID25750061
PMCPMC4586005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.