Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25750046›Full record

ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2015

Lactic acid bacteria--20 years exploring their potential as live vectors for mucosal vaccination.

Agnieszka Wyszyńska, Patrycja Kobierecka, Jacek Bardowski, Elżbieta Katarzyna Jagusztyn-Krynicka

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 81 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
21.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A Safe and Versatile Minicell Platform Derived fromJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  5. RecombinantFuture microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Isolation andFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Effect of Secretion Efficiency of Mutant KRAS Neoantigen byInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Agnieszka WyszyńskaDepartment of Bacterial Genetics, Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Miecznikowa 1, 02-096, Warsaw, Poland.
Patrycja Kobierecka
Jacek Bardowski
Elżbieta Katarzyna Jagusztyn-Krynicka
University of Warsaw · PLInstitute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are a diverse group of Gram-positive, nonsporulating, low G + C content bacteria. Many of them have been given generally regarded as safe status. Over the past two decades, intensive genetic and molecular research carried out on LAB, mainly Lactococcus lactis and some species of the Lactobacillus genus, has revealed new, potential biomedical LAB applications, including the use of LAB as adjuvants, immunostimulators, or therapeutic drug delivery systems, or as factories to produce therapeutic molecules. LAB enable immunization via the mucosal route, which increases effectiveness against pathogens that use the mucosa as the major route of entry into the human body. In this review, we concentrate on the encouraging application of Lactococcus and Lactobacillus genera for the development of live mucosal vaccines. First, we present the progress that has recently been made in the field of developing tools for LAB genetic manipulations, which has resulted in the successful expression of many bacterial, parasitic, and viral antigens in LAB strains. Next, we discuss the factors influencing the efficacy of the constructed vaccine prototypes that have been tested in various animal models. Apart from the research focused on an application of live LABs as carriers of foreign antigens, a lot of work has been recently done on the potential usage of nonliving, nonrecombinant L. lactis designated as Gram-positive enhancer matrix (GEM), as a delivery system for mucosal vaccination. The advantages and disadvantages of both strategies are also presented.

Indexed as

Lactic AcidAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdministration, MucosalAntigens, BacterialAntigens, ViralCloning, MolecularGenetic EngineeringGram-Positive BacteriaHumansImmunizationLactobacillusLactococcus lactisVaccinesVaccines, DNAAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntigens, BacterialAntigens, ViralLactic AcidVaccinesVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID25750046
PMCPMC4365182
OpenAlexW2093756727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.