ArticleVirus genes2015
Fluorometric RdRp assay with self-priming RNA.
Article in Virus genes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interference of small compounds and MgScientific reports · 2024Article
- Development of Fluorescence-Based Assays for Key Viral Proteins in the SARS-CoV-2 Infection Process and Lifecycle.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Identifying Small-Molecule Inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase by Establishing a Fluorometric Assay.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase as a target for high-throughput drug screening.Future virology · 2022Review
- The current state of validated small molecules inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 nonstructural proteins.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2021Review
- RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase as a Target for COVID-19 Drug Discovery.SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is an outmost need for the identification of specific antiviral compounds. Current antivirals lack specificity, making them susceptible to off-target effects, and highlighting importance of development of assays to discover antivirals targeting viral specific proteins. Previous studies for identification of inhibitors of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) mostly relied on radioactive methods. This study describes a fluorometric approach to assess in vitro activity of viral RdRp for drug screening. Using readily available DNA- and RNA-specific fluorophores, we determined an optimum fluorometric approach that could be used in antiviral discovery specifically for RNA viruses by targeting RdRp. Here, we show that double-stranded RNA could be successfully distinguished from single-stranded RNA. In addition, we provide a strategy based on self-priming RNA to assess RdRp activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.