Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25749967›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2015

Genome-wide patterns of genetic variation among silkworms.

Xingtan Zhang, Mengyun Nie, Qian Zhao, Yuqian Wu, Genhong Wang, Qingyou Xia

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xingtan ZhangState Key Laboratory of Silkworm Genome Biology, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Mengyun Nie
Qian Zhao
Yuqian Wu
Genhong Wang
Qingyou Xia

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the draft genome sequence of silkworm is available for a decade, its genetic variations, especially structural variations, are far from well explored. In this study, we identified 1,298,659 SNPs and 9,731 indels, of which 32 % of SNPs and 92.2 % of indels were novel compared to previous silkworm re-sequencing analysis. In addition, we applied a read depth-based approach to investigate copy number variations among 21 silkworm strains at genome-wide level. This effort resulted in 562 duplicated and 41 deleted CNV regions, and among them 442 CNV were newly identified. Functional annotation of genes affected by these genetic variations reveal that these genes include a wide spectrum of molecular functions, such as immunity and drug detoxification, which are important for the adaptive evolution of silkworms. We further validated the predicted CNV regions using q-PCR. 94.7 % (36/38) of the selected regions show divergent copy numbers compared to a single-copy gene OR2. In addition, potential presence/absence variations are also observed in our study: 11 genes are present in the reference genome, but absent in other strains. Overall, we draw an integrative map of silkworm genetic variation at genome-wide level. The identification of genetic variations in this study improves our understanding that these variants play important roles in shaping phenotypic variations between wild and domesticated silkworms.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationINDEL MutationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsBase SequenceBombyxChromosomes, InsectCluster AnalysisDNA Copy Number VariationsGenes, InsectGenome, InsectGenotypeInsect ProteinsPhenotypePolymerase Chain ReactionInsect Proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.