ArticleProtoplasma2015
The effect of LDL particles on the behaviour of epithelial noncancer and cancer cell lines after in vitro induced injury.
Article in Protoplasma, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell spreading capability and cell proliferation are the major processes in wound healing of injured epithelia as well as in tumour progression. The effect of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles as a major extracellular source of cholesterol was evaluated in the re-epithelisation assay of in vitro induced injury. We selected two noncancer cell lines with different dependence on LDL concentrations, the kidney epithelial cells (MDCK) with higher dependence and keratinocytes (HaCaT) with lower dependence on LDL, and three cancer cell lines originating from epithelial cells: A549 (alveolar), CaCo-2 (intestinal) and RT4 (urothelial). All cells were incubated in a control medium, in an LDL-enriched medium or in an LDL-deficient medium. The LDL-enriched medium stimulated cell spreading of MDCK cells which, together with increased proliferation of these cells, resulted in an enhanced re-epithelisation of in vitro induced injury. LDL deficiency caused lower cell spreading which resulted in a decreased re-epithelisation despite the higher proliferation of MDCK cells in this medium. The re-epithelisation of keratinocytes (HaCaT) was not affected by altered LDL concentrations. In cancer cell lines A549, CaCo-2 and RT4, wide heterogeneity regarding cell proliferation and spreading capability was observed after treatment with different LDL concentrations. LDL had no influence on actin filament and tight junction distribution in any of the tested cell lines. The cholesterol content of all cell types, except for CaCo-2 cells, proved to be independent of the LDL level. Further research of the beneficial effects of LDL is needed to prove LDL as a safe enhancer of epithelial wound healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.