Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25749873›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2015

Perceptions of usage and unintended consequences of provision of ready-to-use therapeutic food for management of severe acute child malnutrition. A qualitative study in Southern Ethiopia.

Elazar Tadesse, Yemane Berhane, Anders Hjern, Pia Olsson, Eva-Charlotte Ekström

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. La pérennité d'un projet de prévention et de prise en charge de la malnutrition au Niger.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elazar TadesseDepartment Women's and Children's Health, International Maternal and Child Health Uppsala University, SE-75185 Uppsala, Sweden, Department of Reproductive Health, Population and Nutrition, Addis Continental Institute of Public Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and.
Yemane BerhaneDepartment of Reproductive Health, Population and Nutrition, Addis Continental Institute of Public Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and.
Anders HjernClinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Centre for Health Equity Studies, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pia OlssonDepartment Women's and Children's Health, International Maternal and Child Health Uppsala University, SE-75185 Uppsala, Sweden.
Eva-Charlotte EkströmDepartment Women's and Children's Health, International Maternal and Child Health Uppsala University, SE-75185 Uppsala, Sweden, Lotta.Ekstrom@kbh.uu.se.
Addis Continental Institute of Public Health · ETUppsala University · SECentre for Health Equity Studies · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere acute child malnutrition (SAM) is associated with high risk of mortality. To increase programme effectiveness in management of SAM, community-based management of acute malnutrition (CMAM) programme that treats SAM using ready-to-use-therapeutic foods (RUTF) has been scaled-up and integrated into existing government health systems. The study aimed to examine caregivers' and health workers perceptions of usages of RUTF in a chronically food insecure area in South Ethiopia.

methodsThis qualitative study recorded, transcribed and translated focus group discussions and individual interviews with caregivers of SAM children and community health workers (CHWs). Data were complemented with field notes before qualitative content analysis was applied.

resultsRUTF was perceived and used as an effective treatment of SAM; however, caregivers also see it as food to be shared and when necessary a commodity to be sold for collective benefits for the household. Caregivers expected prolonged provision of RUTF to contribute to household resources, while the programme guidelines prescribed RUTF as a short-term treatment to an acute condition in a child. To get prolonged access to RUTF caregivers altered the identities of SAM children and sought multiple admissions to CMAM programme at different health posts that lead to various control measures by the CHWs.

conclusionEven though health workers provide RUTF as a treatment for SAM children, their caregivers use it also for meeting broader food and economic needs of the household endangering the effectiveness of CMAM programme. In chronically food insecure contexts, interventions that also address economic and food needs of entire household are essential to ensure successful treatment of SAM children. This may need a shift to view SAM as a symptom of broader problems affecting a family rather than a disease in an individual child.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsAcute DiseaseChild Nutrition DisordersChild, PreschoolCommunity Health ServicesDisease ManagementEthiopiaFocus GroupsFood SupplyGovernment ProgramsHumansQualitative Researchchronic food insecurityCommunity-based managementEthiopiaperceptionsRUTFSAM

Identifiers

PMID25749873
PMCPMC4625758
OpenAlexW2158460592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.