Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25749825›Full record

Trial reportHaematologica2015

Randomized trial of radiation-free central nervous system prophylaxis comparing intrathecal triple therapy with liposomal cytarabine in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Renato Bassan, Arianna Masciulli, Tamara Intermesoli, Ernesta Audisio, Giuseppe Rossi, Enrico Maria Pogliani, Vincenzo Cassibba, Daniele Mattei, Claudio Romani, Agostino Cortelezzi and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Haematologica, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Intrathecal drug delivery in the era of nanomedicine.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Blocking autophagy enhanced leukemia cell death induced by recombinant human arginase.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Renato BassanU.O.C. Ematologia, Ospedale dell'Angelo e Ospedale SS. Giovanni e Paolo, Mestre-Venezia renato.bassan@ulss12.ve.it.
Arianna MasciulliLaboratorio di Epidemiologia Clinica delle Malattie Cardiovascolari, Fondazione Mario Negri Sud, S.Maria Imbaro, Chieti.
Tamara IntermesoliU. O. C. Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo.
Ernesta AudisioEmatologia 2, Presidio Ospedaliero Molinette, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino.
Giuseppe RossiDivisione di Ematologia, Spedali Civili, Brescia.
Enrico Maria PoglianiU.O. di Ematologia e TMO, Ospedale S.Gerardo, Monza Brianza.
Vincenzo CassibbaDivisione di Ematologia e TMO, Ospedale S. Maurizio, Bolzano.
Daniele MatteiS.C. Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo.
Claudio RomaniU.O. Ematologia e Centro TMO, Ospedale Armando Businco, Cagliari.
Agostino CortelezziU.O. Ematologia e TMO, Fondazione IRCSS Cà Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano.
Consuelo CortiEmatologia e TMO, Ospedale S. Raffaele, Milano, Italy.
Anna Maria ScattolinU.O.C. Ematologia, Ospedale dell'Angelo e Ospedale SS. Giovanni e Paolo, Mestre-Venezia.
Orietta SpinelliU. O. C. Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo.
Manuela TosiU. O. C. Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo.
Margherita ParoliniU. O. C. Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo.
Filippo MarmontEmatologia 2, Presidio Ospedaliero Molinette, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino.
Erika BorlenghiDivisione di Ematologia, Spedali Civili, Brescia.
Monica FumagalliU.O. di Ematologia e TMO, Ospedale S.Gerardo, Monza Brianza.
Sergio CortelazzoDivisione di Ematologia e TMO, Ospedale S. Maurizio, Bolzano.
Andrea GallaminiS.C. Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo.
Rosa Maria MarfisiLaboratorio di Epidemiologia Clinica delle Malattie Cardiovascolari, Fondazione Mario Negri Sud, S.Maria Imbaro, Chieti.
Elena OldaniU. O. C. Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo.
Alessandro RambaldiU. O. C. Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo.
Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · ITAzienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITAzienda Sanitaria Ospedaliera S.Croce e Carle Cuneo · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITMario Negri Sud Foundation · ITOspedale dell' Angelo · ITOspedale di Bolzano · ITPresidio Ospedaliero · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITFundação Armando Alvares Penteado · BRIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing optimal radiation-free central nervous system prophylaxis is a desirable goal in acute lymphoblastic leukemia, to avoid the long-term toxicity associated with cranial irradiation. In a randomized, phase II trial enrolling 145 adult patients, we compared intrathecal liposomal cytarabine (50 mg: 6/8 injections in B-/T-cell subsets, respectively) with intrathecal triple therapy (methotrexate/cytarabine/prednisone: 12 injections). Systemic therapy included methotrexate plus cytarabine or L-asparaginase courses, with methotrexate augmented to 2.5 and 5 g/m(2) in Philadelphia-negative B- and T-cell disease, respectively. The primary study objective was the comparative assessment of the risk/benefit ratio, combining the analysis of feasibility, toxicity and efficacy. In the liposomal cytarabine arm 17/71 patients (24%) developed grade 3-4 neurotoxicity compared to 2/74 (3%) in the triple therapy arm (P=0.0002), the median number of episodes of neurotoxicity of any grade was one per patient compared to zero, respectively (P=0.0001), and even though no permanent disabilities or deaths were registered, four patients (6%) discontinued intrathecal prophylaxis on account of these toxic side effects (P=0.06). Neurotoxicity worsened with liposomal cytarabine every 14 days (T-cell disease), and was improved by the adjunct of intrathecal dexamethasone. Two patients in the liposomal cytarabine arm suffered from a meningeal relapse (none with T-cell disease, only one after high-dose chemotherapy) compared to four in the triple therapy arm (1 with T-cell disease). While intrathecal liposomal cytarabine could contribute to improved, radiation-free central nervous system prophylaxis, the toxicity reported in this trial does not support its use at 50 mg and prompts the investigation of a lower dosage. (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT-00795756).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCytarabineFemaleHumansInjections, SpinalLiposomesMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPost-Exposure ProphylaxisPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaYoung AdultAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCytarabineLiposomes

Identifiers

PMID25749825
PMCPMC4450624
OpenAlexW2133645964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.