Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25749601›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs2014

A hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of an evidence-based exercise intervention for breast cancer survivors.

Rinad S Beidas, Breah Paciotti, Fran Barg, Andrea R Branas, Justin C Brown, Karen Glanz, Angela DeMichele, Laura DiGiovanni, Domenick Salvatore, Kathryn H Schmitz

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Weight Lifting and Physical Function Among Survivors of Breast Cancer: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2015
    Trial
  8. An exploratory analysis of 24-h movement behaviors in individuals with cancer completing a 12-week resistance exercise intervention.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  9. Facilitators to the implementation of exercise into cancer care: a systematic review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Promoting Physical Activity in Rural Settings: Effectiveness and Potential Strategies.Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine · 2021
    Article
  15. The challenge of timing: a qualitative study on clinician and patient perspectives about implementing exercise-based rehabilitation in an acute cancer treatment setting.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rinad S BeidasDepartment of Psychiatry (RSB), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (BP, FB, KHS), Abramson Cancer Center (AB, KG, AD, LD, DS, KHS), and Center for Clinical Epidemiology (JCB, KG, AD, LD, DS, KHS), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Good Shepherd Penn Partners, Philadelphia, PA (AB); Biobehavioral Health Science Department, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (KG).
Breah PaciottiDepartment of Psychiatry (RSB), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (BP, FB, KHS), Abramson Cancer Center (AB, KG, AD, LD, DS, KHS), and Center for Clinical Epidemiology (JCB, KG, AD, LD, DS, KHS), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Good Shepherd Penn Partners, Philadelphia, PA (AB); Biobehavioral Health Science Department, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (KG).
Fran BargDepartment of Psychiatry (RSB), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (BP, FB, KHS), Abramson Cancer Center (AB, KG, AD, LD, DS, KHS), and Center for Clinical Epidemiology (JCB, KG, AD, LD, DS, KHS), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Good Shepherd Penn Partners, Philadelphia, PA (AB); Biobehavioral Health Science Department, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (KG).
Andrea R BranasDepartment of Psychiatry (RSB), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (BP, FB, KHS), Abramson Cancer Center (AB, KG, AD, LD, DS, KHS), and Center for Clinical Epidemiology (JCB, KG, AD, LD, DS, KHS), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Good Shepherd Penn Partners, Philadelphia, PA (AB); Biobehavioral Health Science Department, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (KG).
Justin C BrownDepartment of Psychiatry (RSB), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (BP, FB, KHS), Abramson Cancer Center (AB, KG, AD, LD, DS, KHS), and Center for Clinical Epidemiology (JCB, KG, AD, LD, DS, KHS), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Good Shepherd Penn Partners, Philadelphia, PA (AB); Biobehavioral Health Science Department, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (KG).
Karen GlanzDepartment of Psychiatry (RSB), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (BP, FB, KHS), Abramson Cancer Center (AB, KG, AD, LD, DS, KHS), and Center for Clinical Epidemiology (JCB, KG, AD, LD, DS, KHS), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Good Shepherd Penn Partners, Philadelphia, PA (AB); Biobehavioral Health Science Department, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (KG).
Angela DeMicheleDepartment of Psychiatry (RSB), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (BP, FB, KHS), Abramson Cancer Center (AB, KG, AD, LD, DS, KHS), and Center for Clinical Epidemiology (JCB, KG, AD, LD, DS, KHS), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Good Shepherd Penn Partners, Philadelphia, PA (AB); Biobehavioral Health Science Department, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (KG).
Laura DiGiovanniDepartment of Psychiatry (RSB), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (BP, FB, KHS), Abramson Cancer Center (AB, KG, AD, LD, DS, KHS), and Center for Clinical Epidemiology (JCB, KG, AD, LD, DS, KHS), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Good Shepherd Penn Partners, Philadelphia, PA (AB); Biobehavioral Health Science Department, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (KG).
Domenick SalvatoreDepartment of Psychiatry (RSB), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (BP, FB, KHS), Abramson Cancer Center (AB, KG, AD, LD, DS, KHS), and Center for Clinical Epidemiology (JCB, KG, AD, LD, DS, KHS), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Good Shepherd Penn Partners, Philadelphia, PA (AB); Biobehavioral Health Science Department, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (KG).
Kathryn H SchmitzDepartment of Psychiatry (RSB), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (BP, FB, KHS), Abramson Cancer Center (AB, KG, AD, LD, DS, KHS), and Center for Clinical Epidemiology (JCB, KG, AD, LD, DS, KHS), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Good Shepherd Penn Partners, Philadelphia, PA (AB); Biobehavioral Health Science Department, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (KG). Schmitz@upenn.edu.
Good Shepherd Penn Partners · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

INSTITUTIONAL CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARDUL1RR024134 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FITZGERALD, GARRET A · 2006 to 2011
$70.4M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000003 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FITZGERALD, GARRET A · 2012 to 2015
$38.9M
IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES IRI-MHSR25MH080916 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Byron James Powell · 2009 to 2026
$3.7M
Policy to Implementation: Evidence-Based Practice in Community Mental HealthK23MH099179 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BEIDAS, RINAD SARY · 2012 to 2016
$887k
Disseminating PALR21CA152451 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SCHMITZ, KATHRYN H. · 2011 to 2012
$383k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000003NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000003NCI NIH HHS R21 CA152451NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR024134NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH099179NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH080916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe primary aims of this hybrid Type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial were to quantitatively assess whether an evidence-based exercise intervention for breast cancer survivors, Strength After Breast Cancer, was safe and effective in a new setting and to qualitatively assess barriers to implementation.

methodsA cohort of 84 survivors completed measurements related to limb volume, muscle strength, and body image at baseline, 67 survivors completed measurements 12 months later. Qualitative methods were used to understand barriers to implementation experienced by referring oncology clinicians and physical therapists who delivered the program.

resultsSimilar to the efficacy trial, the revised intervention demonstrated safety with regard to lymphedema, and led to improvements in lymphedema symptoms, muscular strength, and body image. Comparison of effects in the effectiveness trial to effects in the efficacy trial revealed larger strength increases in the efficacy trial than in the effectiveness trial (P < .04), but few other differences were found. Qualitative implementation data suggested significant barriers around intervention characteristics, payment, eligibility criteria, the referral process, the need for champions (ie, advocates), and the need to adapt during implementation of the intervention, which should be considered in future dissemination and implementation efforts.

conclusionsThis trial successfully demonstrated that a physical therapy led strength training program for breast cancer survivors can be implemented in a community setting while retaining the effectiveness and safety of the clinical trial. However, during the translation process, strategies to reduce barriers to implementation are required. This new program can inform larger scale dissemination and implementation efforts.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelResistance TrainingAdultAgedBody ImageBreast NeoplasmsEvidence-Based MedicineExerciseFemaleHumansIntegrative MedicineLymphedemaMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthPatient Selection

Identifiers

PMID25749601
PMCPMC4411538
OpenAlexW2103671197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.