Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25749567›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2015

Characterisation and comparison of temporal release profiles of nitric oxide generating donors.

Sophie A Bradley, Joern R Steinert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The aerotaxis ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nitric Oxide Signaling in the Auditory Pathway.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. eLife · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Embryogenesis of the peristaltic reflex.The Journal of physiology · 2019
    Article
  11. Nitric oxide increases biofilm formation inBiotechnology for biofuels · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sophie A BradleyMRC Toxicology Unit, Hodgkin Building, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 9HN, UK.
Joern R SteinertMRC Toxicology Unit, Hodgkin Building, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 9HN, UK. Electronic address: js333@le.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U132681855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNitric oxide (NO) is a vital signalling molecule in a variety of tissues including the neuronal, vascular and reproductive system. However, its high diffusibility and inactivation make characterisation of nitrergic signalling difficult. The use of NO donors is essential to characterise downstream signalling pathways but knowledge of donor release capacities is lacking, thus making comparisons of donor responses difficult. NEW

methodThis study characterises NO profiles of commonly used NO donors. Donors were stored under defined conditions and temporal release profiles detected to allow determination of released NO concentrations.

resultsUsing NO-sensitive microsensors we assessed release profiles of NO donors following different storage times and conditions. We found that donors such as NOC-5 and PAPA-NONOate decayed substantially within days, whereas SNP and GSNO showed greater stability releasing consistent levels of NO over days. In all donors tested, the amount of released NO differs between frozen and unfrozen stocks. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): Fluorescent and amperometric approaches to measure NO concentrations yield a wide range of levels. However, due to a lack of characterisation of the release profiles, inconsistent effects on NO signalling have been widely documented. Our systematic assessment of release profiles of a range of NO donors therefore provides new essential data allowing for improved and defined investigations of nitrergic signalling.

conclusionsThis is the first systematic comparison of temporal release profiles of different NO donors allowing researchers to compare conditions across different studies and the use of defined NO levels by choosing specific donors and concentrations.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalAnimalsHumansNitric OxideNitric Oxide DonorsTime FactorsNitric OxideNitric Oxide DonorsApollo-1000Nitric oxide concentrationNO donorNO sensitive electrodeRelease profileStock solution

Identifiers

PMID25749567
PMCPMC4401449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.