Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25749371›Full record

ReviewStem cells and development2015

Advances in reprogramming-based study of neurologic disorders.

Anjana Nityanandam, Kristin K Baldwin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells and development, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Differentiation of diabetic foot ulcer-derived induced pluripotent stem cells reveals distinct cellular and tissue phenotypes.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neuronal signaling · 2017
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anjana NityanandamDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California.
Kristin K BaldwinDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California.

Funding

Genome-wide investigation of somatic mutation in the developing and aging brainR01MH102698 · NIMH · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI BALDWIN, KRISTIN KAY, HALL, IRA M · 2014 to 2018
$3.4M
The architecture and development of a sensory processing circuit for smellR01DC012592 · NIDCD · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI BALDWIN, KRISTIN KAY · 2012 to 2016
$2.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC012592NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012592NIMH NIH HHS MH102698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The technology to convert adult human non-neural cells into neural lineages, through induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), somatic cell nuclear transfer, and direct lineage reprogramming or transdifferentiation has progressed tremendously in recent years. Reprogramming-based approaches aimed at manipulating cellular identity have enormous potential for disease modeling, high-throughput drug screening, cell therapy, and personalized medicine. Human iPSC (hiPSC)-based cellular disease models have provided proof of principle evidence of the validity of this system. However, several challenges remain before patient-specific neurons produced by reprogramming can provide reliable insights into disease mechanisms or be efficiently applied to drug discovery and transplantation therapy. This review will first discuss limitations of currently available reprogramming-based methods in faithfully and reproducibly recapitulating disease pathology. Specifically, we will address issues such as culture heterogeneity, interline and inter-individual variability, and limitations of two-dimensional differentiation paradigms. Second, we will assess recent progress and the future prospects of reprogramming-based neurologic disease modeling. This includes three-dimensional disease modeling, advances in reprogramming technology, prescreening of hiPSCs and creating isogenic disease models using gene editing.

Indexed as

Cellular ReprogrammingAnimalsCell TransplantationGenetic TherapyHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsNeurodegenerative DiseasesRegenerative Medicine

Identifiers

PMID25749371
PMCPMC4440984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.