Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25749323›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Influence of commonly used primer systems on automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis of bacterial communities in environmental samples.

Witoon Purahong, Barbara Stempfhuber, Guillaume Lentendu, Davide Francioli, Thomas Reitz, François Buscot, Michael Schloter, Dirk Krüger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Witoon PurahongUFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Soil Ecology, Halle (Saale), Germany; Technical University of Munich, Chair for Soil Science, Oberschleissheim, Germany.
Barbara StempfhuberHelmholtz Zentrum München, Research Unit for Environmental Genomics, Oberschleissheim, Germany.
Guillaume LentenduUFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Soil Ecology, Halle (Saale), Germany; University of Leipzig, Institute of Biology, Leipzig, Germany.
Davide FrancioliUFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Soil Ecology, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Thomas ReitzUFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Soil Ecology, Halle (Saale), Germany.
François BuscotUFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Soil Ecology, Halle (Saale), Germany; University of Leipzig, Institute of Biology, Leipzig, Germany; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Leipzig, Germany.
Michael SchloterTechnical University of Munich, Chair for Soil Science, Oberschleissheim, Germany; Helmholtz Zentrum München, Research Unit for Environmental Genomics, Oberschleissheim, Germany.
Dirk KrügerUFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Soil Ecology, Halle (Saale), Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the high diversity of bacteria in many ecosystems, their slow generation times, specific but mostly unknown nutrient requirements and syntrophic interactions, isolation based approaches in microbial ecology mostly fail to describe microbial community structure. Thus, cultivation independent techniques, which rely on directly extracted nucleic acids from the environment, are a well-used alternative. For example, bacterial automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (B-ARISA) is one of the widely used methods for fingerprinting bacterial communities after PCR-based amplification of selected regions of the operon coding for rRNA genes using community DNA. However, B-ARISA alone does not provide any taxonomic information and the results may be severely biased in relation to the primer set selection. Furthermore, amplified DNA stemming from mitochondrial or chloroplast templates might strongly bias the obtained fingerprints. In this study, we determined the applicability of three different B-ARISA primer sets to the study of bacterial communities. The results from in silico analysis harnessing publicly available sequence databases showed that all three primer sets tested are specific to bacteria but only two primers sets assure high bacterial taxa coverage (1406f/23Sr and ITSF/ITSReub). Considering the study of bacteria in a plant interface, the primer set ITSF/ITSReub was found to amplify (in silico) sequences of some important crop species such as Sorghum bicolor and Zea mays. Bacterial genera and plant species potentially amplified by different primer sets are given. These data were confirmed when DNA extracted from soil and plant samples were analyzed. The presented information could be useful when interpreting existing B-ARISA results and planning B-ARISA experiments, especially when plant DNA can be expected.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiodiversityDNA PrimersGenes, BacterialPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, RibosomalSoftwareSoil MicrobiologyDNA PrimersRNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID25749323
PMCPMC4351999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.