Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25748930›Full record

ReviewCell stem cell2015

The cancer stem cell niche: how essential is the niche in regulating stemness of tumor cells?

Vicki Plaks, Niwen Kong, Zena Werb

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell stem cell, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 903 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
903citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

903 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Stemness in Colon Cancer.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Proteomic profiling of CD133 + and CD326 + (EpCAM) subpopulations in A549 cells: insights into pluripotency and tumor heterogeneity.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

843 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vicki PlaksDepartment of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0452, USA.
Niwen KongDepartment of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0452, USA.
Zena WerbDepartment of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0452, USA. Electronic address: zena.werb@ucsf.edu.

Funding

Role of Metalloproteinases in Mammary Gland RemodelingR01CA057621 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI WERB, ZENA · 1993 to 2017
$9.0M
(PQC4) Fate of cells disseminating from human breast cancer xenograftsR01CA180039 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI WERB, ZENA · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS CA057621NCI NIH HHS CA180039NCI NIH HHS R01 CA057621NCI NIH HHS R01 CA180039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are tumor cells that have the principal properties of self-renewal, clonal tumor initiation capacity, and clonal long-term repopulation potential. CSCs reside in niches, which are anatomically distinct regions within the tumor microenvironment. These niches maintain the principle properties of CSCs, preserve their phenotypic plasticity, protect them from the immune system, and facilitate their metastatic potential. In this perspective, we focus on the CSC niche and discuss its contribution to tumor initiation and progression. Since CSCs survive many commonly employed cancer therapies, we examine the prospects of targeting the niche components as preferable therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsStem Cell NicheTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID25748930
PMCPMC4355577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.