Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25748921›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

A high-throughput in vitro drug screen in a genetically engineered mouse model of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma identifies BMS-754807 as a promising therapeutic agent.

Kyle G Halvorson, Kelly L Barton, Kristin Schroeder, Katherine L Misuraca, Christine Hoeman, Alex Chung, Donna M Crabtree, Francisco J Cordero, Raj Singh, Ivan Spasojevic and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kyle G HalvorsonDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America; Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America; Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America; Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Kelly L BartonDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America; Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Kristin SchroederDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America; Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Katherine L MisuracaGraduate Program in Molecular Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Christine HoemanDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America; Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Alex ChungDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America; Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Donna M CrabtreeDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America; Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Francisco J CorderoDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America; Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Raj SinghDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America; Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Ivan SpasojevicDepartment of Medicine-Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America; Duke Cancer Institute, Pharmaceutical Services-PK/PD Core Laboratory, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Noah BerlowDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States of America.
Ranadip PalDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States of America.
Oren J BecherDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America; Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America; Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Duke University Hospital · USDuke Medical Center · USTexas Tech University · USDuke Cancer InstituteDuke University · US

Funding

Training Program in Developmental & Stem Cell BiologyT32HD040372 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Terry H Lechler · 2001 to 2026
$8.9M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD040372
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPGs) represent a particularly lethal type of pediatric brain cancer with no effective therapeutic options. Our laboratory has previously reported the development of genetically engineered DIPG mouse models using the RCAS/tv-a system, including a model driven by PDGF-B, H3.3K27M, and p53 loss. These models can serve as a platform in which to test novel therapeutics prior to the initiation of human clinical trials. In this study, an in vitro high-throughput drug screen as part of the DIPG preclinical consortium using cell-lines derived from our DIPG models identified BMS-754807 as a drug of interest in DIPG. BMS-754807 is a potent and reversible small molecule multi-kinase inhibitor with many targets including IGF-1R, IR, MET, TRKA, TRKB, AURKA, AURKB. In vitro evaluation showed significant cytotoxic effects with an IC50 of 0.13 μM, significant inhibition of proliferation at a concentration of 1.5 μM, as well as inhibition of AKT activation. Interestingly, IGF-1R signaling was absent in serum-free cultures from the PDGF-B; H3.3K27M; p53 deficient model suggesting that the antitumor activity of BMS-754807 in this model is independent of IGF-1R. In vivo, systemic administration of BMS-754807 to DIPG-bearing mice did not prolong survival. Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated that tumor tissue drug concentrations of BMS-754807 were well below the identified IC50, suggesting that inadequate drug delivery may limit in vivo efficacy. In summary, an unbiased in vitro drug screen identified BMS-754807 as a potential therapeutic agent in DIPG, but BMS-754807 treatment in vivo by systemic delivery did not significantly prolong survival of DIPG-bearing mice.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Screening AssaysAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBrain Stem NeoplasmsDisease Models, AnimalGliomaMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPyrazolesSurvival RateTriazinesAntineoplastic AgentsBMS 754807PyrazolesTriazines

Identifiers

PMID25748921
PMCPMC4352073
OpenAlexW2001249814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.