Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25748671›Full record

Trial reportJournal of dentistry2015

Immediate human pulp response to ethanol-wet bonding technique.

Débora Lopes Salles Scheffel, Nancy Tomoko Sacono, Ana Paula Dias Ribeiro, Diana Gabriela Soares, Fernanda Gonçalves Basso, David Pashley, Carlos Alberto de Souza Costa, Josimeri Hebling

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of dentistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Débora Lopes Salles ScheffelDepartment of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Araraquara School of Dentistry, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Rua Humaitá, 1680, Araraquara, São Paulo 14801-903, Brazil.
Nancy Tomoko SaconoDepartment of Stomatology (Oral Pathology), Dental School, Federal University of Goiás, Av. Décima Primeira Avenida, 62000 - Setor Leste Universitário, Goiânia, Goiás 74605-020, Brazil.
Ana Paula Dias RibeiroDepartment of Dentistry, Dental School, Federal University of Brasilia, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília, Distrito Federal 70910-900, Brazil.
Diana Gabriela SoaresDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araraquara School of Dentistry, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Rua Humaitá, 1680, Araraquara, São Paulo 14801-903, Brazil.
Fernanda Gonçalves BassoDepartment of Physiology and Pathology, Araraquara School of Dentistry, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Rua Humaitá, 1680, Araraquara, São Paulo 14801-903, Brazil.
David PashleyDepartment of Oral Biology, College of Dental Medicine, Georgia Regents University, 1120 15th Street, CL-2112, Augusta, GA 30912-1129, USA.
Carlos Alberto de Souza CostaDepartment of Physiology and Pathology, Araraquara School of Dentistry, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Rua Humaitá, 1680, Araraquara, São Paulo 14801-903, Brazil.
Josimeri HeblingDepartment of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Araraquara School of Dentistry, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Rua Humaitá, 1680, Araraquara, São Paulo 14801-903, Brazil. Electronic address: jhebling@foar.unesp.br.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRAugusta University · USCentro Universitário de Araraquara · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BR

Funding

Reasons for poor durability of resin-dentin bondsR01DE015306 · NIDCR · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA (MCG) · PI PASHLEY, DAVID H · 2004 to 2013
$4.4M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE015306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the short-term response of human pulps to ethanol-wet bonding technique.

methodsDeep class V cavities were prepared on 17 sound premolars and divided into three groups. After acid-etching, the cavities from groups 1 (G1) and 2 (G2) were filled with 100% ethanol or distilled water, respectively, for 60 s before the application of Single Bond 2. In group 3 (G3, control), the cavity floor was lined with calcium hydroxide before etching and bonding. All cavities were restored with resin composite. Two teeth were used as intact control. The teeth were extracted 48h after the clinical procedures. From each tooth serial sections were obtained and stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H/E) and Masson's trichrome. Bacteria microleakage was assessed using Brown & Brenn. All sections were blindly evaluated for five histological features.

resultsMean remaining dentine thickness was 463±65μm (G1); 425±184μm (G2); and 348±194μm (G3). Similar pulp reactions followed ethanol- or water-wet bonding techniques. Slight inflammatory responses and disruption of the odontoblast layer related to the cavity floor were seen in all groups. Stained bacteria were not detected in any cavities. Normal pulp tissue was observed in G3 except for one case.

conclusionsAfter 48h, ethanol-wet bonding does not increase pulpal damage compared to water-wet bonding technique. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Ethanol-wet bonding may increase resin-dentine bond durability. This study reported the in vivo response of human pulp tissue when 100% ethanol was applied previously to an etch-and-rinse simplified adhesive system.

Indexed as

Dental Cavity PreparationAdolescentBicuspidBiocompatible MaterialsDental BondingDental Cavity LiningDental LeakageDental PulpDental Pulp ExposureDentinDentin-Bonding AgentsEthanolHumansOdontoblastsBiocompatible MaterialsDentin-Bonding AgentsEthanolBiocompatibilityDental pulpDentine bonding agentEthanol

Identifiers

PMID25748671
PMCPMC4758457
OpenAlexW2060653269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.