ArticlePLoS genetics2015
Pervasive variation of transcription factor orthologs contributes to regulatory network evolution.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational strategies for cross-species knowledge transfer.Nature methods · 2026Review
- The evolutionary foundations of transcriptional regulation in animals.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025Review
- Developmental system drift and modular gene regulatory networks shape gastrulation inLife science alliance · 2025Article
- Chinmo is a novel regulator of differential Hippo signaling response within a single developing organ.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Computational strategies for cross-species knowledge transfer and translational biomedicine.ArXiv · 2024Article
- Functional and regulatory diversity of homeobox-leucine zipper transcription factors BnaHB6 under dehydration and salt stress in Brassica napus L.Plant molecular biology · 2024Article
- Primate protein-ligand interfaces exhibit significant conservation and unveil human-specific evolutionary drivers.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- dSPRINT: predicting DNA, RNA, ion, peptide and small molecule interaction sites within protein domains.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- The ortholog conjecture revisited: the value of orthologs and paralogs in function prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Article
- Similarity regression predicts evolution of transcription factor sequence specificity.Nature genetics · 2019Article
- Genetic architecture and sex-specific selection govern modular, male-biased evolution ofScience advances · 2019Article
- Evolutionary divergence of the sex-determining geneDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2018Article
- Conservation and Diversification of Circadian Rhythmicity Between a Model Crassulacean Acid Metabolism PlantFrontiers in plant science · 2018Article
- Evolution of new regulatory functions on biophysically realistic fitness landscapes.Nature communications · 2017Article
- Denys-Drash syndrome associated WT1 glutamine 369 mutants have altered sequence-preferences and altered responses to epigenetic modifications.Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
- A trans-acting Variant within the Transcription Factor RIM101 Interacts with Genetic Background to Determine its Regulatory Capacity.PLoS genetics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Differences in transcriptional regulatory networks underlie much of the phenotypic variation observed across organisms. Changes to cis-regulatory elements are widely believed to be the predominant means by which regulatory networks evolve, yet examples of regulatory network divergence due to transcription factor (TF) variation have also been observed. To systematically ascertain the extent to which TFs contribute to regulatory divergence, we analyzed the evolution of the largest class of metazoan TFs, Cys2-His2 zinc finger (C2H2-ZF) TFs, across 12 Drosophila species spanning ~45 million years of evolution. Remarkably, we uncovered that a significant fraction of all C2H2-ZF 1-to-1 orthologs in flies exhibit variations that can affect their DNA-binding specificities. In addition to loss and recruitment of C2H2-ZF domains, we found diverging DNA-contacting residues in ~44% of domains shared between D. melanogaster and the other fly species. These diverging DNA-contacting residues, found in ~70% of the D. melanogaster C2H2-ZF genes in our analysis and corresponding to ~26% of all annotated D. melanogaster TFs, show evidence of functional constraint: they tend to be conserved across phylogenetic clades and evolve slower than other diverging residues. These same variations were rarely found as polymorphisms within a population of D. melanogaster flies, indicating their rapid fixation. The predicted specificities of these dynamic domains gradually change across phylogenetic distances, suggesting stepwise evolutionary trajectories for TF divergence. Further, whereas proteins with conserved C2H2-ZF domains are enriched in developmental functions, those with varying domains exhibit no functional enrichments. Our work suggests that a subset of highly dynamic and largely unstudied TFs are a likely source of regulatory variation in Drosophila and other metazoans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.