Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25748434›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2015

Chromatin mediation of a transcriptional memory effect in yeast.

Emily Paul, Itay Tirosh, William Lai, Michael J Buck, Michael J Palumbo, Randall H Morse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Emily PaulLaboratory of Molecular Genetics, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York Department of Biomedical Science, University at Albany School of Public Health, Albany, New York.
Itay TiroshDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
William LaiDepartment of Biochemistry and the Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics and Life Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
Michael J BuckDepartment of Biochemistry and the Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics and Life Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
Michael J PalumboLaboratory of Molecular Genetics, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York.
Randall H MorseLaboratory of Molecular Genetics, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York Department of Biomedical Science, University at Albany School of Public Health, Albany, New York randall.morse@health.ny.gov.
New York State Department of Health · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USWeizmann Institute of Science · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have described a transcriptional "memory effect," whereby transcript levels of many Abf1-regulated genes in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae are undiminished even after Abf1 has dissociated from its regulatory sites. Here we provide additional support for this effect and investigate its molecular basis. We show that the effect is observed in a distinct abf1 ts mutant from that used in earlier studies, demonstrating that it is robust, and use chromatin immunoprecipitation to show that Abf1 association is decreased similarly from memory effect and transcriptionally responsive genes at the restrictive temperature. We also demonstrate that the association of TATA-binding protein and Pol II decreases after the loss of Abf1 binding for transcriptionally responsive genes but not for memory effect genes. Examination of genome-wide nucleosome occupancy data reveals that although transcriptionally responsive genes exhibit increased nucleosome occupancy in abf1 ts yeast, the promoter regions of memory effect targets show no change in abf1 ts mutants, maintaining an open chromatin conformation even after Abf1 eviction. This contrasting behavior reflects different inherent propensity for nucleosome formation between the two classes, driven by the presence of A/T-rich sequences upstream of the Abf1 site in memory effect gene promoters. These sequence-based differences show conservation in closely related fungi and also correlate with different gene expression noise, suggesting a physiological basis for greater access to "memory effect" promoter regions. Thus, our results establish a conserved mechanism underlying a transcriptional memory effect whereby sequences surrounding Abf1 binding sequences affect local nucleosome occupancy following loss of Abf1 binding. Furthermore, these findings demonstrate that sequence-based differences in the propensity for nucleosome occupancy can influence the transcriptional response of genes to an altered regulatory signal.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, FungalTranscription, GeneticBinding SitesChromatinFungal ProteinsMutationNucleosomesPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingTranscription FactorsYeastsChromatinFungal ProteinsNucleosomesTranscription FactorsAbf1ChIP-seqchromatinnucleosometranscriptionyeast

Identifiers

PMID25748434
PMCPMC4426369
OpenAlexW2166200703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.