Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25748250›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2015

Watching eyes take shape.

Naiara Bazin-Lopez, Leonardo E Valdivia, Stephen W Wilson, Gaia Gestri

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Pax2a, but not pax2b, influences cell survival and periocular mesenchyme localization to facilitate zebrafish optic fissure closure.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naiara Bazin-LopezDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, UCL, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Leonardo E ValdiviaDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, UCL, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Stephen W WilsonDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, UCL, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom. Electronic address: s.wilson@ucl.ac.uk.
Gaia GestriDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, UCL, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom. Electronic address: g.gestri@ucl.ac.uk.
University College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0501487Medical Research Council G0900994Medical Research Council MR/L003775/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebrate eye formation is a multistep process requiring coordinated inductive interactions between neural and non-neural ectoderm and underlying mesendoderm. The induction and shaping of the eyes involves an elaborate cellular choreography characterized by precise changes in cell shape coupled with complex cellular and epithelial movements. Consequently, the forming eye is an excellent model to study the cellular mechanisms underlying complex tissue morphogenesis. Using examples largely drawn from recent studies of optic vesicle formation in zebrafish and in cultured embryonic stem cells, in this short review, we highlight some recent advances in our understanding of the events that shape the vertebrate eye.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsEctodermEmbryonic Stem CellsEyeGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalOrganogenesisSpecies SpecificityVertebratesZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID25748250
PMCPMC4931046
OpenAlexW2027512063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.