ArticleCirculation2015
Comparison of self-reported and Medicare claims-identified acute myocardial infarction.
Article in Circulation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Concordance between clinical outcomes in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial and in the electronic health record.Contemporary clinical trials · 2023Trial
- Neighborhood characteristics and incident myocardial infarction in US older adults: evaluation in 2 nationwide cohorts.American journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Validity and Reliability of Self-Reported Prevalent and Incident Cardiovascular Disease Among Asian Adults.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Article
- The Australian Genetic Heart Disease Registry: Protocol for a Data Linkage Study.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Cardiovascular disease risk factors in autistic adults: The impact of sleep quality and antipsychotic medication use.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2023Article
- Comparison of prevalence and exposure-disease associations using self-report and hospitalization data among enrollees of the world trade center health registry.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Article
- Comparison of International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision Codes With Electronic Medical Records Among Patients With Symptoms of Coronavirus Disease 2019.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Rates and Predictors of Patient Underreporting of Hospitalizations During Follow-Up After Acute Myocardial Infarction: An Assessment From the TRIUMPH Study.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2020Article
- COMBINING INFORMATION FROM MULTIPLE DATA SOURCES TO ASSESS POPULATION HEALTH.Journal of survey statistics and methodology · 2020Article
- Design and analytic considerations for using patient-reported health data in pragmatic clinical trials: report from an NIH Collaboratory roundtable.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Article
- Aggregating multiple real-world data sources using a patient-centered health-data-sharing platform.NPJ digital medicine · 2020Article
- Relationship between smoking status and muscle strength in the United States older adults.Epidemiology and health · 2020Article
- Enduring somatic threat perceptions and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in survivors of cardiac events.Journal of health psychology · 2019Article
- The Impact of Cardiac-induced Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms on Cardiovascular Outcomes: Design and Rationale of the Prospective Observational Reactions to Acute Care and Hospitalizations (ReACH) Study.Health psychology bulletin · 2019Article
- Are Cardiovascular Risk Factors Stronger Predictors of Incident Cardiovascular Disease in U.S. Adults With Versus Without a History of Clinical Depression?Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2018Article
- Could Cardiovascular Health Metrics Account for Age and Sex Disparities in Self-Reported Ischemic Heart Disease Prevalence?Journal of clinical medicine · 2018Article
- Evaluation of the Pooled Cohort Risk Equations for Cardiovascular Risk Prediction in a Multiethnic Cohort From the Women's Health Initiative.JAMA internal medicine · 2018Observational
- Deepwater Horizon oil spill exposures and nonfatal myocardial infarction in the GuLF STUDY.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2018Article
- Atypical depression and double depression predict new-onset cardiovascular disease in U.S. adults.Depression and anxiety · 2018Article
- Using Self-reports or Claims to Assess Disease Prevalence: It's Complicated.Medical care · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular disease is often studied through patient self-report and administrative data. However, these 2 sources provide different information, and few studies have compared them. METHODS AND
resultsWe compared data from a longitudinal, nationally representative survey of older Americans with matched Medicare claims. Self-reported heart attack in the previous 2 years was compared with claims-identified acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and acute coronary syndrome. Among the 3.1% of respondents with self-reported heart attack, 32.8% had claims-identified AMI, 16.5% had non-AMI acute coronary syndrome, and 25.8% had other cardiac claims; 17.3% had no inpatient visits in the previous 2.5 years. Claims-identified AMIs were found in 1.4% of respondents; of these, 67.8% reported a heart attack. Self-reports were less likely among respondents >75 years of age (62.7% versus 74.6%; P=0.006), with less than high school education (61.6% versus 71.4%; P=0.015), with at least 1 limitation in activities of daily living (59.6% versus 74.7%; P=0.001), or below the 25th percentile of a word recall memory test (60.7% versus 71.3%; P=0.019). Both self-reported and claims-identified cardiac events were associated with increased mortality; the highest mortality was observed among those with claims-identified AMI who did not self-report (odds ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-5.1) and among those with self-reported heart attack and claims-identified AMI (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-3.6) or non-AMI acute coronary syndrome (odds ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-4.1).
conclusionsThere is considerable disagreement between self-reported and claims-identified events. Although self-reported heart attack may be inaccurate, it indicates increased risk of death, regardless of whether the self-report is confirmed by Medicare claims.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.