Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25747551›Full record

ArticleArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2015

Geographic and facility variation in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: multilevel analysis of functional status.

Timothy A Reistetter, Yong-Fang Kuo, Amol M Karmarkar, Karl Eschbach, Srinivas Teppala, Jean L Freeman, Kenneth J Ottenbacher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Length of Stay and Functional Outcomes Among Patients with Stroke Discharged from an Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility in Saudi Arabia.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Variation in Functional Status After Hip Fracture: Facility and Regional Influence on Mobility and Self-Care.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2017
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Timothy A ReistetterDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX. Electronic address: tareiste@utmb.edu.
Yong-Fang KuoDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
Amol M KarmarkarDivision of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
Karl EschbachInternal Medicine-Division of Geriatrics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
Srinivas TeppalaDivision of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
Jean L FreemanInternal Medicine-Division of Geriatrics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
Kenneth J OttenbacherDivision of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.

Funding

UTMB OAIC Research Education Component (REC)P30AG024832 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI JAMES S. GOODWIN, MD, MELISSA M. MORROW · 2005 to 2026
$26.7M
UTMB Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000071 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI BRASIER, ALLAN R. · 2012 to 2014
$14.4M
Rehabilitation Research Career Development ProgramK12HD055929 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI BROWN, DAVID A · 2007 to 2021
$11.7M
Patient Centered Outcomes Research in the ElderlyR24HS022134 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI GOODWIN, MD, JAMES S. · 2013 to 2017
$4.8M
Center for Rehabilitation Research Using Large DatasetsR24HD065702 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI OTTENBACHER, KENNETH J. · 2010 to 2014
$4.0M
Hospital Readmission and Inpatient Medical RehabilitationR01HD069443 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI OTTENBACHER, KENNETH J. · 2012 to 2015
$927k
Regional Variability in Inpatient Rehabilitation among Medicare BeneficiariesK01HD068513 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI REISTETTER, TIMOTHY · 2011 to 2014
$438k
AHRQ HHS R24 HS022134AHRQ HHS R24HS022134NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000071NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024832NIA NIH HHS P30-AG024832NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD068513NICHD NIH HHS K01-HD068513NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055929NICHD NIH HHS K12-HD055929NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069443NICHD NIH HHS R01-HD069443NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD065702NICHD NIH HHS R24-HD065702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine geographic and facility variation in cognitive and motor functional outcomes after postacute inpatient rehabilitation in patients with stroke.

designRetrospective cohort design using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) claims files. Records from 1209 rehabilitation facilities in 298 hospital referral regions (HRRs) were examined. Patient records were analyzed using linear mixed models. Multilevel models were used to calculate the variation in outcomes attributable to facilities and geographic regions.

settingInpatient rehabilitation units and facilities.

participantsPatients (N=145,460) with stroke discharged from inpatient rehabilitation from 2006 through 2009.

interventionNot applicable.

main outcome measuresCognitive and motor functional status at discharge measured by items in the CMS Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility-Patient Assessment Instrument.

resultsVariation profiles indicated that 19.1% of rehabilitation facilities were significantly below the mean functional status rating (mean ± SD, 81.58±22.30), with 221 facilities (18.3%) above the mean. Total discharge functional status ratings varied by 3.57 points across regions. Across facilities, functional status values varied by 29.2 points, with a 9.1-point difference between the top and bottom deciles. Variation in discharge motor function attributable to HRR was reduced by 82% after controlling for cluster effects at the facility level.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that variation in motor and cognitive function at discharge after postacute rehabilitation in patients with stroke is accounted for more by facility than geographic location.

Indexed as

Recovery of FunctionStroke RehabilitationActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overCognitionFemaleHumansInpatientsInsurance Claim ReviewLength of StayMaleMedicareMultilevel AnalysisRehabilitation CentersRetrospective StudiesHealth policyHealth servicesOutcome assessment (health care)Quality indicators, health careRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID25747551
PMCPMC4599713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.