Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25747513›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Bacterial diversity associated with wild caught Anopheles mosquitoes from Dak Nong Province, Vietnam using culture and DNA fingerprint.

Chung Thuy Ngo, Fabien Aujoulat, Francisco Veas, Estelle Jumas-Bilak, Sylvie Manguin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mosquito Gut Microbiota: A Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Characterization of the Tissue and Strain-Specific Microbiota ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Bacterial Microbiome in Wild-CaughtFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Diversity of the Bacterial Microbiota ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chung Thuy NgoInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), UMR-MD3, Faculté de Pharmacie, Montpellier, France; National Institute of Veterinary Research, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Fabien AujoulatUniversity Montpellier 1, UMR 5119 ECOSYM, Equipe Pathogènes et Environnements, Faculté de Pharmacie, Montpellier, France.
Francisco VeasInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), UMR-MD3, Faculté de Pharmacie, Montpellier, France.
Estelle Jumas-BilakUniversity Montpellier 1, UMR 5119 ECOSYM, Equipe Pathogènes et Environnements, Faculté de Pharmacie, Montpellier, France.
Sylvie ManguinInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), UMR-MD3, Faculté de Pharmacie, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrobiota of Anopheles midgut can modulate vector immunity and block Plasmodium development. Investigation on the bacterial biodiversity in Anopheles, and specifically on the identification of bacteria that might be used in malaria transmission blocking approaches, has been mainly conducted on malaria vectors of Africa. Vietnam is an endemic country for both malaria and Bancroftian filariasis whose parasitic agents can be transmitted by the same Anopheles species. No information on the microbiota of Anopheles mosquitoes in Vietnam was available previous to this study.

methodThe culture dependent approach, using different mediums, and culture independent (16S rRNA PCR - TTGE) method were used to investigate the bacterial biodiversity in the abdomen of 5 Anopheles species collected from Dak Nong Province, central-south Vietnam. Molecular methods, sequencing and phylogenetic analysis were used to characterize the microbiota. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The microbiota in wild-caught Anopheles was diverse with the presence of 47 bacterial OTUs belonging to 30 genera, including bacterial genera impacting Plasmodium development. The bacteria were affiliated with 4 phyla, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, the latter being the dominant phylum. Four bacterial genera are newly described in Anopheles mosquitoes including Coxiella, Yersinia, Xanthomonas, and Knoellia. The bacterial diversity per specimen was low ranging from 1 to 4. The results show the importance of pairing culture and fingerprint methods to better screen the bacterial community in Anopheles mosquitoes.

conclusionSampled Anopheles species from central-south Vietnam contained a diverse bacterial microbiota that needs to be investigated further in order to develop new malaria control approaches. The combination of both culture and DNA fingerprint methods allowed a thorough and complementary screening of the bacterial community in Anopheles mosquitoes.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnophelesBacteriaSpecies SpecificityVietnam

Identifiers

PMID25747513
PMCPMC4352016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.