Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25747157›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Can acupuncture treatment be double-blinded? An evaluation of double-blind acupuncture treatment of postoperative pain.

Lene Vase, Sara Baram, Nobuari Takakura, Miho Takayama, Hiroyoshi Yajima, Akiko Kawase, Lars Schuster, Ted J Kaptchuk, Søren Schou, Troels Staehelin Jensen and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
18.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Qihuang Needle Therapy for Motor Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Lene VaseDepartment of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Danish Pain Research Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sara BaramSection of Clinical Oral Physiology, Department of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Section of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Pathology, Department of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Nobuari TakakuraDepartment of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Tokyo Ariake University of Medical and Health Sciences, Tokyo, Japan.
Miho TakayamaDepartment of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Tokyo Ariake University of Medical and Health Sciences, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyoshi YajimaDepartment of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Tokyo Ariake University of Medical and Health Sciences, Tokyo, Japan.
Akiko KawaseDepartment of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Tokyo Ariake University of Medical and Health Sciences, Tokyo, Japan.
Lars SchusterThe Acupuncture Academy, Copenhagen and Aarhus, Denmark.
Ted J KaptchukBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Søren SchouSection of Clinical Oral Physiology, Department of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Troels Staehelin JensenDanish Pain Research Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Robert ZachariaeDepartment of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Peter SvenssonSection of Clinical Oral Physiology, Department of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Tokyo Ariake University of Medical and Health Sciences · JPAarhus University · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USDanish Pain Research Center · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blinding protects against bias but the success of blinding is seldom assessed and reported in clinical trials including studies of acupuncture where blinding represents a major challenge. Recently, needles with the potential for double-blinding were developed, so we tested if acupuncture can be double-blinded in a randomized study of sixty-seven patients with acute pain ≥ 3 (0-10 scale following third molar removal) who received active acupuncture with a penetrating needle or placebo acupuncture with a non-penetrating needle. To test if acupuncture was administered double-blind, patients and acupuncturists were asked about perceived treatment allocation at the end of the study. To test if there were clues which led to identification of the treatment, deep dull pain associated with needle application and rotation (termed "de qi" in East Asian medicine), and patients' pain levels were assessed. Perceived treatment allocation depended on actual group allocation (p < 0.015) for both patients and acupuncturists, indicating that the needles were not successful in double-blinding. Up to 68% of patients and 83% of acupuncturists correctly identified the treatment, but for patients the distribution was not far from 50/50. Also, there was a significant interaction between actual or perceived treatment and the experience of de qi (p = 0.027), suggesting that the experience of de qi and possible non-verbal clues contributed to correct identification of the treatment. Yet, of the patients who perceived the treatment as active or placebo, 50% and 23%, respectively, reported de qi. Patients' acute pain levels did not influence the perceived treatment. In conclusion, acupuncture treatment was not fully double-blinded which is similar to observations in pharmacological studies. Still, the non-penetrating needle is the only needle that allows some degree of practitioner blinding. The study raises questions about alternatives to double-blind randomized clinical trials in the assessment of acupuncture treatment.

Indexed as

Acupuncture AnalgesiaAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMalePain ManagementPostoperative PainTooth Extraction

Identifiers

PMID25747157
PMCPMC4352029
OpenAlexW2153723005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.