Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25745499›Full record

ReviewAIDS research and therapy2014

A consensus statement on the renal monitoring of Australian patients receiving tenofovir based antiviral therapy for HIV/HBV infection.

Stephen G Holt, David M Gracey, Miriam T Levy, David W Mudge, Ashley B Irish, Rowan G Walker, Richard Baer, Jacob Sevastos, Riaz Abbas, Mark A Boyd

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AIDS research and therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen G HoltThe Royal Melbourne Hospital and Faculty of Medicine University of Melbourne, 300 Grattan St, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC 3050 Australia.
David M GraceyRoyal Prince Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Missenden Rd, Camperdown, NSW 2050 Australia.
Miriam T LevyLiverpool Hospital, Elizabeth St, Liverpool, NSW 2170 Australia.
David W MudgePrincess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102 Australia.
Ashley B IrishRoyal Perth Hospital, 197 Wellington St, Perth, WA 6000 Australia.
Rowan G WalkerAlfred Hospital, and Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004 Australia.
Richard BaerCairns Base Hospital, 165 The Esplanade, Cairns, QLD 4870 Australia.
Jacob SevastosSt. Vincent's Hospital, 390 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010 Australia.
Riaz AbbasMedical Affairs, Gilead Sciences, Level 6, 417 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004 Australia.
Mark A BoydKirby Institute, UNSW, Sydney, NSW 2052 Australia.
Australian Wool Innovation (Australia) · AUCairns Hospital · AUGilead Sciences (Australia) · AULiverpool Hospital · AUMonash University · AUPrincess Alexandra Hospital · AURoyal Perth Hospital · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUSt Vincent's Hospital Sydney · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A number of antiviral agents used against Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection and hepatitis B virus (HBV) mono or co-infection have been associated with real nephrotoxicity (including tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), atazanavir, indinavir and lopinavir) or apparent changes in renal function (e.g. cobicistat, ritonavir, rilpivirine and dolutegravir). Patients with HIV are at higher risk of acute and chronic renal dysfunction, so baseline assessment and ongoing monitoring of renal function is an important part of routine management of patients with HIV. Given the paucity of evidence in this area, we sought to establish a consensus view on how routine monitoring could be performed in Australian patients on ART regimens, especially those involving TDF. A group of nephrologists and prescribers (an HIV physician and a hepatologist) were assembled by Gilead to discuss practical and reasonable renal management strategies for patients particularly those on TDF-based combination regimens (in the case of those with HIV-infection) or on TDF-monotherapy (in the case of HBV-mono infection). The group considered which investigations should be performed as part of routine practice, their frequency, and when specialist renal referral is warranted. The algorithm presented suggests testing for serum creatinine along with plasma phosphate and an assessment of urinary protein (rather than albumin) and glucose. Here we advocate baseline tests of renal function at initiation of therapy. If creatinine excretion inhibitors (e.g. cobicistat or rilpivirine) are used as part of the ART regimen, we suggest creatinine is rechecked at 4 weeks and this value used as the new baseline. Repeat testing is suggested at 3-monthly intervals for a year and then at least yearly thereafter if no abnormalities are detected. In patients with abnormal baseline results, renal function assessment should be performed at least 6 monthly. In HBV mono-infected patients advocate that a similar testing protocol may be logical.

Indexed as

Fanconi syndromeHepatitis BHIVMonitoringRenal failureTenofovir

Identifiers

PMID25745499
PMCPMC4350301
OpenAlexW2168682946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.