Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25745124›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2015

Barriers to health care in rural Mozambique: a rapid ethnographic assessment of planned mobile health clinics for ART.

Amee Schwitters, Philip Lederer, Leah Zilversmit, Paula Samo Gudo, Isaias Ramiro, Luisa Cumba, Epifanio Mahagaja, Kebba Jobarteh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Mobile clinics for women's and children's health.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amee SchwittersCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Center for Global Health, Atlanta, GA, USA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Epidemic Intelligence Service, Atlanta, GA, USA efn6@cdc.gov.
Philip LedererCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Center for Global Health, Atlanta, GA, USA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Epidemic Intelligence Service, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Leah ZilversmitCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Maputo, Mozambique Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Paula Samo GudoCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Maputo, Mozambique.
Isaias RamiroMozambique Ministry of Health, Xai Xai, Mozambique.
Luisa CumbaMinistry of Health, Zambezia, Mozambique.
Epifanio MahagajaMinistry of Health, Zambezia, Mozambique.
Kebba JobartehCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Maputo, Mozambique.

Funding

PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Mozambique, 1.6 million people are living with HIV, and over 60% of the population lives in rural areas lacking access to health services. Mobile health clinics, implemented in 2013 in 2 provinces, are beginning to offer antiretroviral therapy (ART) and basic primary care services. Prior to introduction of the mobile health clinics in the communities, we performed a rapid ethnographic assessment to understand barriers to accessing HIV care and treatment services and acceptability and potential use of the mobile health clinics as an alternative means of service delivery.

methodsWe conducted assessments in Gaza province in January 2013 and in Zambezia Province in April-May 2013 in districts where mobile health clinic implementation was planned. Community leaders served as key informants, and chain-referral sampling was used to recruit participants. Interviews were conducted with community leaders, health care providers, traditional healers, national health system patients, and traditional healer patients. Interviewees were asked about barriers to health services and about mobile health clinic acceptance.

resultsIn-depth interviews were conducted with 117 participants (Gaza province, n = 57; Zambezia Province, n = 60). Barriers to accessing health services included transportation and distance-related issues (reliability, cost, and travel time). Participants reported concurrent use of traditional and national health systems. The decision to use a particular health system depended on illness type, service distance, and lack of confidence in the national health system. Overall, participants were receptive to using mobile health clinics for their health care and ability to increase access to ART. Hesitations concerning mobile health clinics included potentially long wait times due to high patient loads. Participants emphasized the importance of regular and published visit schedules and inclusion of community members in planning mobile health clinic services.

conclusionMobile health clinics can address many barriers to uptake of HIV services, particularly related to transportation issues. Involvement of community leaders, providers, traditional healers, and patients, as well as regularly scheduled mobile clinic visits, are critical to successful service delivery implementation in rural areas.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesHealth Services AccessibilityMobile Health UnitsPatient Acceptance of Health CareRural Health ServicesRural PopulationAdultAgedAnthropology, CulturalAnti-HIV AgentsDelivery of Health CareFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID25745124
PMCPMC4356279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.