Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25745024›Full record

ArticleGenetics2015

A powerful nonparametric statistical framework for family-based association analyses.

Ming Li, Zihuai He, Daniel J Schaid, Mario A Cleves, Todd G Nick, Qing Lu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ming LiDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72202.
Zihuai HeDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109.
Daniel J SchaidDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.
Mario A ClevesDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72202.
Todd G NickDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72202.
Qing LuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824 qlu@epi.msu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7943-966X
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USMayo Clinic · USMichigan State University · US

Funding

Arkansas Center for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR000039 · NCATS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI BECK, CORNELIA MARIE, JAMES, LAURA P · 2012 to 2014
$10.0M
Quantitative Methods for Genetic EpidemiologyR01GM065450 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI SCHAID, DANIEL J. · 2002 to 2020
$5.6M
Drug Dependence Epidemiology and EnviromicsK05DA015799 · NIDA · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ANTHONY, JAMES CHRISTOPHER · 2003 to 2015
$1.4M
Gene-Gene/Gene-Environment Interactions Associated with Nicotine DependenceK01DA033346 · NIDA · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LU, QING · 2013 to 2017
$833k
Arkansas Center for Clinical Translational ResearchKL2TR000063 · NCATS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI BECK, CORNELIA MARIE, JAMES, LAURA P · 2012 to 2014
$459k
High-dimensional Statistical Genetic Approach for Family-based Orofacial CleftsR03DE022379 · NIDCR · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LU, QING · 2012 to 2013
$441k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000063NCATS NIH HHS KL2TR000063NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000039NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000039NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA033346NIDA NIH HHS K01DA033346NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA015799NIDA NIH HHS K05DA015799NIDCR NIH HHS R03 DE022379NIDCR NIH HHS R03DE022379NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Family-based study design is commonly used in genetic research. It has many ideal features, including being robust to population stratification (PS). With the advance of high-throughput technologies and ever-decreasing genotyping cost, it has become common for family studies to examine a large number of variants for their associations with disease phenotypes. The yield from the analysis of these family-based genetic data can be enhanced by adopting computationally efficient and powerful statistical methods. We propose a general framework of a family-based U-statistic, referred to as family-U, for family-based association studies. Unlike existing parametric-based methods, the proposed method makes no assumption of the underlying disease models and can be applied to various phenotypes (e.g., binary and quantitative phenotypes) and pedigree structures (e.g., nuclear families and extended pedigrees). By using only within-family information, it can offer robust protection against PS. In the absence of PS, it can also utilize additional information (i.e., between-family information) for power improvement. Through simulations, we demonstrated that family-U attained higher power over a commonly used method, family-based association tests, under various disease scenarios. We further illustrated the new method with an application to large-scale family data from the Framingham Heart Study. By utilizing additional information (i.e., between-family information), family-U confirmed a previous association of CHRNA5 with nicotine dependence.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticPedigreeGenetic Association StudiesHumansStatistics, Nonparametricbetween-family informationnicotine dependencepedigree structurepopulation stratificationwithin-family information

Identifiers

PMID25745024
PMCPMC4423382
OpenAlexW2069706793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.