Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25744954›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2016

An Adaptation of Motivational Interviewing Increases Quit Attempts in Smokers With Serious Mental Illness.

Marc L Steinberg, Jill M Williams, Naomi F Stahl, Patricia Dooley Budsock, Nina A Cooperman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Web-Delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Versus Smokefree.gov for Smokers With Bipolar Disorder.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Trial
  6. A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial of Brief Interventions to Encourage Quit Attempts in Smokers From Socioeconomic Disadvantage.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Trial
  7. History and Correlates of Smoking Cessation Behaviors Among Smokers With Serious Mental Illness.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marc L SteinbergDepartment of Psychiatry, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ marc.steinberg@rutgers.edu.
Jill M WilliamsDepartment of Psychiatry, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
Naomi F StahlDepartment of Psychiatry, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
Patricia Dooley BudsockDepartment of Psychiatry, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
Nina A CoopermanDepartment of Psychiatry, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USJohnson University · US

Funding

Persistence-Targeted Smoking CessationR34DA030652 · NIDA · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI STEINBERG, MARC L · 2011 to 2013
$720k
Treatment Issues In Smokers with SchizophreniaK23DA018203 · NIDA · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI STEINBERG, MARC L · 2004 to 2008
$702k
NIDA NIH HHS 1R34DA030652NIDA NIH HHS 5K23DA018203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSmokers with serious mental illness (SMI) have a high smoking prevalence and a low quit rate. Motivational interviewing (MI) is an empirically supported approach for addressing substance use disorders and may motivate smokers with SMI to quit.

methodsWe randomized smokers (N = 98) with SMI to receive a single 45-minute session of (1) MI with personalized feedback or (2) interactive education. We hypothesized that participants receiving the MI intervention would be more likely to follow-up on a referral for tobacco dependence treatment, to make a quit attempt, and to quit smoking than those receiving the interactive educational intervention.

resultsSmokers receiving an MI intervention were significantly more likely to make a quit attempt by the 1-month follow-up (34.7% vs. 14.3%; OR = 4.39 [95% CI = 1.44 to 13.34], P = .009); however, these quit attempts did not translate into abstinence. In addition, 32.7% of those receiving MI followed-up on a referral for tobacco dependence treatment (vs. 20.4% receiving interactive education; OR = 2.02 [95% CI = 0.76 to 3.55], P = .157). MI Treatment Integrity Code ratings indicated that the interventions were easily distinguishable from each other and that MI was delivered with proficiency. Despite the intervention's brevity, participants reported high levels of therapeutic alliance with their therapist.

conclusionsA brief adaptation of MI with personalized feedback appears to be a promising approach for increasing quit attempts in smokers with SMI, but future research is required to determine how to best help smokers with SMI to attain sustained abstinence.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedMotivational InterviewingSmokingSmoking CessationTobacco Use Disorder

Identifiers

PMID25744954
PMCPMC4750086
OpenAlexW2102190811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.