Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25744890›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Cerebellar control of saccade dynamics: contribution of the fastigial oculomotor region.

Julie Quinet, Laurent Goffart

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Electrical Microstimulation of the Superior Colliculus in Strabismic Monkeys.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2016
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Does the Brain Extrapolate the Position of a Transient Moving Target?The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julie QuinetInstitut de Neurosciences de la Timone, UMR 7289, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Laurent GoffartInstitut de Neurosciences de la Timone, UMR 7289, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France laurent.goffart@univ-amu.fr.
Aix-Marseille Université · FRInstitut de Neurosciences de la Timone · FR

Funding

EYE MOVEMENT CONTROL: ROLE OF BRAIN STEM NEURONSR01EY001189 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI MAUNSELL, JOHN H.R. · 1985 to 2005
$2.9M
EYE MOVEMENT CONTROL;ROLE OF BRAIN STEM NEURONSR37EY001189 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SPARKS, DAVID LEE · 1987 to 1996
–
NEI NIH HHS EY-01189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fastigial oculomotor region is the output by which the medioposterior cerebellum influences the generation of saccades. Recent inactivation studies reported observations suggesting an involvement in their dynamics (velocity and duration). In this work, we tested this hypothesis in the head-restrained monkey with the electrical microstimulation technique. More specifically, we studied the influence of duration, frequency, and current on the saccades elicited by fastigial stimulation and starting from a central (straight ahead) position. The results show ipsilateral or contralateral saccades whose amplitude and dynamics depend on the stimulation parameters. The duration and amplitude of their horizontal component increase with the duration of stimulation up to a maximum amplitude. Varying the stimulation frequency mostly changes their latency and the peak velocity (for contralateral saccades). Current also influences the metrics and dynamics of saccades: the horizontal amplitude and peak velocity increase with the intensity, whereas the latency decreases. The changes in peak velocity and in latency observed in contralateral saccades are not correlated. Finally, we discovered that contralateral saccades can be evoked at sites eliciting ipsilateral saccades when the stimulation frequency is reduced. However, their onset is timed not with the onset but with the offset of stimulation. These results corroborate the hypothesis that the fastigial projections toward the pontomedullary reticular formation (PMRF) participate in steering the saccade, whereas the fastigiocollicular projections contribute to the bilateral control of visual fixation. We propose that the cerebellar influence on saccade generation involves recruiting neurons and controlling the size of the active population in the PMRF.

Indexed as

Nonlinear DynamicsAnimalsBiophysicsBrain MappingCerebellar NucleiElectric StimulationFunctional LateralityMacaca mulattaOculomotor MusclesReaction TimeSaccadesTime Factorsbrain stemcerebellumdynamicsprimatesaccade

Identifiers

PMID25744890
PMCPMC4443611
OpenAlexW1984489603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.