Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25744882›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Multiple timescales in the adaptation of the rotational VOR.

Paolo Colagiorgio, Giovanni Bertolini, Christopher J Bockisch, Dominik Straumann, Stefano Ramat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. A software tool for at-home measurement of sensorimotor adaptation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paolo ColagiorgioDepartment of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy;
Giovanni BertoliniDepartment of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; and.
Christopher J BockischDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; and Departments of Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Dominik StraumannDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; and.
Stefano RamatDepartment of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; stefano.ramat@unipv.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Goal-directed movements, such as pointing and saccades, have been shown to share similar neural architectures, in spite of the different neuromuscular systems producing them. Such structure involve an inverse model of the actuator being controlled, which produces the commands innervating the muscles, and a forward model of the actuator, which predicts the sensory consequences of such commands and allows online movement corrections. Recent studies have shown that goal-directed movements also share similar motor-learning and motor-memory mechanisms, which are based on multiple timescales. The hypothesis that also the rotational vestibulo-ocular reflex (rVOR) may be based on a similar architecture has been presented recently. We hypothesize that multiple timescales are the brain's solution to the plasticity-stability dilemma, allowing adaptation to temporary and sudden changes while keeping stable motor-control abilities. If that were the case, then we would also expect the adaptation of reflex movements to follow the same principles. Thus we studied rVOR gain adaptation in eight healthy human subjects using a custom paradigm aimed at investigating the existence of spontaneous recovery, which we considered as the hallmark of multiple timescales in motor learning. Our experimental results show that spontaneous recovery occurred in six of eight subjects. Thus we developed a mathematical model of rVOR adaptation based on two hidden-states processes, which adapts the cerebellar-forward model of the ocular motor plant, and show that it accurately simulates our experimental data on rVOR gain adaptation, whereas a single timescale learning process fails to do so.

Indexed as

RotationAdaptation, PhysiologicalAdultFemaleHumansLearningMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalModels, TheoreticalMovementReflex, Vestibulo-OcularTime Factorsinternal modelsmotor learningmultiple timescalesVOR adaptationVOR adaptation model

Identifiers

PMID25744882
PMCPMC4455561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.