Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25744233›Full record

ArticleThe Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences2015

Investigation of possible prophylactic, renoprotective, and cardioprotective effects of thromboprophylactic drugs against ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Sinan Demirtas, Oguz Karahan, Suleyman Yazıcı, Orkut Guclu, Ahmet Calıskan, Orhan Tezcan, Ibrahim Kaplan, Celal Yavuz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Possible renoprotective effects of dabigatran.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sinan DemirtasMedical School of Dicle University, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Diyarbakir, Turkey. Electronic address: sinandemirtas78@hotmail.com.
Oguz KarahanMedical School of Dicle University, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Diyarbakir, Turkey.
Suleyman YazıcıIstanbul Bilim University, Sisli Florence Nightingale Hospital, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey.
Orkut GucluMedical School of Dicle University, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Diyarbakir, Turkey.
Ahmet CalıskanMedical School of Dicle University, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Diyarbakir, Turkey.
Orhan TezcanMedical School of Dicle University, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Diyarbakir, Turkey.
Ibrahim KaplanMedical School of Dicle University, Department of Biochemistry, Diyarbakir, Turkey.
Celal YavuzMedical School of Dicle University, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Diyarbakir, Turkey.
Dicle University · TRIstanbul Bilim University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether anticoagulant and antiaggregant agents have protective effects against oxidative damage induced by peripheral ischemia-reperfusion (I/R). Groups were created as follows: control group, I/R group (sham group), I/R plus acetylsalicylic acid (Group I), I/R+clopidogrel (Group II), I/R+rivaroxaban (Group III), I/R+bemiparin sodium (Group IV), and I/R+enoxaparin sodium (Group V). In Groups I, II, III, IV, and V, drugs were administered daily for 1 week before I/R creation. Peripheral I/R was induced in the I/R groups by clamping the right femoral artery. The rats were sacrificed 1 hour after reperfusion. Nitrogen oxide levels, malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, paraoxonase-1 (PON1) activity, and prolidase activity were evaluated in both cardiac and renal tissues. There was no significant difference in nitrogen oxide levels between the groups. However, cardiac and renal MDA were significantly higher and PON1 activity was markedly lower in the I/R groups compared with the control group (p<0.05). Although elevated prolidase activity was detected in both the cardiac and renal tissue of the I/R groups, only the sham group and Group V had significantly higher renal prolidase activity (p<0.05). Group V had significantly higher cardiac MDA, PON1, prolidase levels, and renal prolidase activity compared with the sham group (p<0.05). Significant improvement in renal MDA levels was only observed in Group III, and marked improvement was observed in the cardiac MDA levels of Group II when compared with the sham group (p<0.05). Thromboprophylactic agents appear to provide partial or prominent protection against I/R injury.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnticoagulantsAryldialkylphosphataseAspirinCardiotonic AgentsClopidogrelDipeptidasesDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEnoxaparinFemoral ArteryHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHindlimbKidneyMaleMalondialdehydeMorpholinesAnticoagulantsAryldialkylphosphataseAspirinbemiparinCardiotonic AgentsClopidogrelDipeptidasesEnoxaparinHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightMalondialdehydeMorpholinesNitric Oxideproline dipeptidaseRivaroxabanThiophenesTiclopidineAntiaggregant drugsAnticoagulant drugsCardioprotectionIschemia–reperfusion injuryRenoprotection

Identifiers

PMID25744233
PMCPMC11916766
OpenAlexW2055947109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.