Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25743945›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Variations of gastric corpus microbiota are associated with early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and squamous dysplasia.

Dariush Nasrollahzadeh, Reza Malekzadeh, Alexander Ploner, Ramin Shakeri, Masoud Sotoudeh, Saman Fahimi, Siavosh Nasseri-Moghaddam, Farin Kamangar, Christian C Abnet, Björn Winckler and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Human Microbiome in Relation to Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review of Epidemiologic Studies.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Dariush Nasrollahzadeh1] Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 17177, Sweden [2] Digestive Oncology Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Reza MalekzadehDigestive Oncology Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Alexander PlonerDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 17177, Sweden.
Ramin ShakeriDigestive Oncology Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Masoud SotoudehDigestive Oncology Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Saman FahimiDigestive Oncology Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Siavosh Nasseri-MoghaddamDigestive Oncology Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farin KamangarDepartment of Public Health Analysis, School of Community Health and Policy, Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Christian C AbnetDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda MD 20892-7335, USA.
Björn WincklerDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 17177, Sweden.
Farhad Islami1] Digestive Oncology Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran [2] Institute for Translational Epidemiology and Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY 10029-6574, USA.
Paolo BoffettaInstitute for Translational Epidemiology and Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY 10029-6574, USA.
Paul BrennanInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Sanford M DawseyDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda MD 20892-7335, USA.
Weimin YeDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 17177, Sweden.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRKarolinska Institutet · SECentre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FRDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMorgan State University · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observational studies revealed a relationship between changes in gastric mucosa and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) which suggested a possible role for gastric microbiota in ESCC carcinogenesis. In this study we aimed to compare pattern of gastric corpus microbiota in ESCC with normal esophagus. Cases were included subjects with early ESCC (stage I-II) and esophageal squamous dysplasia (ESD) as the cancer precursor. Control groups included age and sex-matched subjects with mid-esophagus esophagitis (diseased-control), and histologically normal esophagus (healthy-control). DNA was extracted from snap-frozen gastric corpus tissues and 16S rRNA was sequenced on GS-FLX Titanium. After noise removal, an average of 3004 reads per sample was obtained from 93 subjects. We applied principal coordinate analysis to ordinate distances from beta diversity data. Pattern of gastric microbiota using Unifrac (p = 0.004) and weighted Unifrac distances (p = 0.018) statistically varied between cases and healthy controls. Sequences were aligned to SILVA database and Clostridiales and Erysipelotrichales orders were more abundant among cases after controling for multiple testing (p = 0.011). No such difference was observed between mid-esophagitis and healthy controls. This study is the first to show that composition of gastric corpus mucosal microbiota differs in early ESCC and ESD from healthy esophagus.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaPrecancerous ConditionsAgedBiodiversityCarcinoma, Squamous CellCase-Control StudiesEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleGastric MucosaHumansMaleMetagenomeMiddle AgedNeoplasm Staging

Identifiers

PMID25743945
PMCPMC4351546
OpenAlexW2022220143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.