Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25743689›Full record

ReviewCell and tissue research2016

Stress signaling in mammalian oocytes and embryos: a basis for intervention and improvement of outcomes.

Keith E Latham

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell and tissue research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Treatment ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Germ Cell Responses to Stress: The Role of RNP Granules.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Keith E LathamDepartment of Animal Science, Reproductive and Developmental Science Program, Michigan State University, 474 S. Shaw Lane, Anthony Hall, Room 1230 E, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. lathamk1@msu.edu.

Funding

Primate Embryo Gene Expression ResourceR24OD012221 · OD · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI LATHAM, KEITH E · 2012 to 2016
$3.0M
Epigenetic links from oocyte to postnatal healthR01HD075903 · NICHD · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LATHAM, KEITH E · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD-075093NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD075903NIH HHS R24 OD-012221NIH HHS R24 OD012221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oocytes and early stage embryos are highly sensitive to variation in diverse exogenous factors such as temperature, osmolarity, oxygen, nutrient restriction, pH, shear stress, toxins, amino acid availability, and lipids. It is becoming increasingly apparent that many such factors negatively affect the endoplasmic reticulum, protein synthesis and protein processing, initiating ER stress and unfolded protein responses. As a result, ER stress signaling serves as a common mediator of cellular responses to diverse stressors. In oocytes and embryos, this leads to developmental arrest and epigenetic changes. Recent studies have revealed that preventing ER stress or inhibiting ER stress signaling can preserve or even enhance oocyte and embryo developmental potential. This review examines ER stress signaling, how it arises, how it affects oocytes and embryos, and how its occurrence can be managed or prevented.

Indexed as

Endoplasmic Reticulum StressSignal TransductionUnfolded Protein ResponseAnimalsAutophagyEmbryo, MammalianEmbryonic DevelopmentFemaleHumansOocytesAutophagyEpigeneticER stressPreimplantation embryoUnfolded protein response

Identifiers

PMID25743689
PMCPMC4561599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.