Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25743562›Full record

ArticleAnimal : an international journal of animal bioscience2015

Non-invasive methods for the determination of body and carcass composition in livestock: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound: invited review.

A M Scholz, L Bünger, J Kongsro, U Baulain, A D Mitchell

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fat deposition and partitioning for meat production in cattle and sheep.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. MRI Anatomical Investigation of Rabbit Bulbourethral Glands.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Growth Performance, Carcass and Meat Traits of AutochthonousAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  19. In Vivo Ultrasound Prediction of the Fillet Volume in Senegalese Sole (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A M Scholz1Livestock Center Oberschleißheim,Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich,Sankt-Hubertusstrasse 12,85764 Oberschleißheim,Germany.
L Bünger2SRUC,Animal and Veterinary Sciences,Roslin Institute Building,Easter Bush,Midlothian,Scotland EH25 9RG,UK.
J Kongsro3Norsvin,Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences,c/o Norwegian University of Life Sciences,PO Box 5003,N-1432 Ås,Norway.
U Baulain4Institute of Farm Animal Genetics,Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut,Hoeltystr.10,31535 Neustadt,Germany.
A D Mitchell5Agricultural Research Service (Retired),US Department of Agriculture, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, BARC-West,Beltsville,MD 20705,USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to accurately measure body or carcass composition is important for performance testing, grading and finally selection or payment of meat-producing animals. Advances especially in non-invasive techniques are mainly based on the development of electronic and computer-driven methods in order to provide objective phenotypic data. The preference for a specific technique depends on the target animal species or carcass, combined with technical and practical aspects such as accuracy, reliability, cost, portability, speed, ease of use, safety and for in vivo measurements the need for fixation or sedation. The techniques rely on specific device-driven signals, which interact with tissues in the body or carcass at the atomic or molecular level, resulting in secondary or attenuated signals detected by the instruments and analyzed quantitatively. The electromagnetic signal produced by the instrument may originate from mechanical energy such as sound waves (ultrasound - US), 'photon' radiation (X-ray-computed tomography - CT, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry - DXA) or radio frequency waves (magnetic resonance imaging - MRI). The signals detected by the corresponding instruments are processed to measure, for example, tissue depths, areas, volumes or distributions of fat, muscle (water, protein) and partly bone or bone mineral. Among the above techniques, CT is the most accurate one followed by MRI and DXA, whereas US can be used for all sizes of farm animal species even under field conditions. CT, MRI and US can provide volume data, whereas only DXA delivers immediate whole-body composition results without (2D) image manipulation. A combination of simple US and more expensive CT, MRI or DXA might be applied for farm animal selection programs in a stepwise approach.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonAnimalsBody CompositionLivestockMagnetic Resonance ImagingMeatReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonicsanimalbody compositionmagnetic resonance imagingultrasoundX-ray attenuation

Identifiers

PMID25743562
PMCPMC4492221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.