Trial reportThe British journal of nutrition2015
Effect of bovine colostrum feeding in comparison with milk replacer and natural feeding on the immune responses and colonisation of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in the intestinal tissue of piglets.
Trial report in The British journal of nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of animal-based indicators to measure thermal, social, and immune-related stress in pigs.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- Infectious Dose of a 2018Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- The colostrum chronicles: identifying porcine milk oligosaccharides in colostrum and investigating their role in litter performance.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Effects of artificial milk on growth performance and intestinal barrier function in suckling piglets: a review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
- Empowering large litters: can enhanced pen design with simulated udders improve piglet growth in their early life?Translational animal science · 2026Article
- Clinical Applications of Bovine Colostrum in GastrointestinaI Disorders: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Therapeutic Potential.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Effects of Supplementation with Goat Transitional Milk on Mortality, Growth, Rectal Temperature, and IgG Serological Level in Low-Birth-Weight Piglets.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Intestine Health and Barrier Function in Fattening Rabbits Fed Bovine Colostrum.Veterinary sciences · 2023Article
- Effect of Bovine Colostrum Dietary Supplementation on Rabbit Meat Quality.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Nourishing neonatal piglets with synthetic milk andFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Review
- Using Nutritional Strategies to Shape the Gastro-Intestinal Tracts of Suckling and Weaned Piglets.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Review
- Early-Life Nutrition Interventions Improved Growth Performance and Intestinal Health via the Gut Microbiota in Piglets.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Article
- Maintaining continuity of nutrient intake after weaning. I. Review of pre-weaning strategies.Translational animal science · 2021Review
- The combination of nutraceuticals and functional feeds as additives modulates gut microbiota and blood markers associated with immune response and health in weanling piglets.Journal of animal science · 2020Article
- Immunoglobulin G from bovine milk primes intestinal epithelial cells for increased colonization of bifidobacteria.AMB Express · 2020Article
- Standardized Natural Citrus Extract dietary supplementation influences sows' microbiota, welfare, and preweaning piglets' performances in commercial rearing conditions.Translational animal science · 2020Article
- The Prophylactic Use of Bovine Colostrum in a Murine Model of TNBS-Induced Colitis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- Article
- Preventive effects of bovine colostrum supplementation in TNBS-induced colitis in mice.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study investigated the effect of feeding bovine colostrum (BC) to piglets in comparison with feeding a milk replacer (MR) and conventional rearing by the sow on the intestinal immune system and number of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) colonising the intestinal tissue. Piglets (23-d-old) were allocated to one of the following four groups: (1) killed at the beginning of the experiment (Base); (2) separated from the sow and fed BC (BC-fed); (3) separated from the sow and fed a MR (MR-fed); (4) kept with the sow (Sow-Milk). Blood was sampled on days 1 and 8, and faecal samples were collected on days 1, 3, 5 and 8. On day 8, piglets were killed and gastrointestinal digesta and intestinal segments were collected. The frequency of diarrhoea was found to be higher (P≤ 0·019) in MR-fed piglets than in BC-fed and Sow-Milk piglets. Piglets from the MR-fed group had the lowest lactic acid bacteria:haemolytic E. coli ratio (P(treat)= 0·064) in the faeces. The number of E. coli colonising the intestinal tissue was higher (P< 0·001) in piglets from the MR-fed group than in those from the BC-fed and Sow-Milk groups. Piglets from the Sow-Milk group had a higher (P= 0·020) mucosal IgG concentration than those from the MR-fed group, but did not exhibit any difference when compared with piglets from the Base and BC-fed groups. Piglets from the BC-fed group exhibited a reduced (P≤ 0·037) expression level of Toll-like receptor-4 in the intestinal mucosa when compared with those from the MR-fed and Sow-Milk groups. The expression level of IL-2 was higher (P≤ 0·051) in piglets from the MR-fed group than in those from the other treatment groups. In conclusion, feeding BC rather than MR to the piglets reduced the colonisation of intestine by ETEC and modulated the intestinal immune system, whereas no differences were observed in piglets fed BC and conventionally reared by the sows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.