Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25742734›Full record

ArticleVeterinary microbiology2015

First study of pathogen load and localisation of ovine footrot using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH).

Luci A Witcomb, Laura E Green, Leo A Calvo-Bado, Claire L Russell, Edward M Smith, Rose Grogono-Thomas, Elizabeth M H Wellington

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Novel 3D Skin Explant Model to Study Anaerobic Bacterial Infection.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Luci A WitcombSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, UK; UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, UK. Electronic address: l.witcomb@ucl.ac.uk.
Laura E GreenSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, UK.
Leo A Calvo-BadoSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, UK.
Claire L RussellSchool of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, UK; Imerys Ltd., Par Moor Centre, Par Moor Rd, Par, Cornwall PL24, UK.
Edward M SmithSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, UK.
Rose Grogono-ThomasSchool of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, UK.
Elizabeth M H WellingtonSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, UK.
University of Warwick · GBImerys (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E017959/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E01870X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBE01870X1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of bacterial populations in situ provides insights into pathogen population dynamics and potential reservoirs for disease. Here we report a culture-independent study of ovine footrot (FR); a debilitating bacterial disease that has significant economic impact on sheep farming worldwide. Disease begins as an interdigital dermatitis (ID), which may then progress to separation of the hoof horn from the underlying epidermis causing severe footrot (SFR). Dichelobacter nodosus is the causative agent of ovine FR, however, the role of Fusobacterium necrophorum and other bacteria present in the environment and on the feet of sheep is less clear. The objective of this study was to use fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) to detect, localise and quantify D. nodosus, F. necrophorum and the domain Bacteria from interdigital skin biopsies of healthy, ID- and SFR-affected feet. D. nodosus and F. necrophorum populations were restricted primarily to the epidermis, but both were detected more frequently in feet with ID or SFR than in healthy feet. D. nodosus cell counts were significantly higher in feet with ID and SFR (p<0.05) than healthy feet, whereas F. necrophorum cell counts were significantly higher only in feet with SFR (p<0.05) than healthy feet. These results, together with other published data, indicate that D. nodosus likely drives pathogenesis of footrot from initiation of ID to SFR; with D. nodosus cell counts increasing prior to onset of ID and SFR. In contrast, F. necrophorum cell counts increase after SFR onset, which may suggest an accessory role in disease pathogenesis, possibly contributing to the severity and duration of SFR.

Indexed as

Sheep, DomesticAnimalsDichelobacter nodosusFoot RotFusobacterium necrophorumHoof and ClawIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescencePopulation DynamicsSheepSheep DiseasesSkinConfocal microscopyDichelobacter nodosusFluorescence in situ hybridisationFootrotFusobacterium necrophorum

Identifiers

PMID25742734
PMCPMC4366039
OpenAlexW1997078673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.