Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25742645›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2015

Replicative DNA polymerase δ but not ε proofreads errors in Cis and in Trans.

Carrie L Flood, Gina P Rodriguez, Gaobin Bao, Arthur H Shockley, Yoke Wah Kow, Gray F Crouse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Coordinated transfer of DNA between Pol θ and Pol δ resets microhomology choice during double-strand break repair.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Recent Advances in Directed Yeast Genome Evolution.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. How asymmetric DNA replication achieves symmetrical fidelity.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. DNA polymerase δ proofreads errors made by DNA polymerase ε.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carrie L FloodDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Gina P RodriguezDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Gaobin BaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Arthur H ShockleyDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Yoke Wah KowDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Gray F CrouseDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Emory University · US

Funding

Resistance to UV Damage: Role of Gene RegulationP01ES011163 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI MARTIN, W DAVID · 2002 to 2012
$12.6M
Cellular Responses to Radiation and Other Types of DamageR01GM080754 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CROUSE, GRAY F. · 2009 to 2012
$1.2M
NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES011163NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080754NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM80754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is now well established that in yeast, and likely most eukaryotic organisms, initial DNA replication of the leading strand is by DNA polymerase ε and of the lagging strand by DNA polymerase δ. However, the role of Pol δ in replication of the leading strand is uncertain. In this work, we use a reporter system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to measure mutation rates at specific base pairs in order to determine the effect of heterozygous or homozygous proofreading-defective mutants of either Pol ε or Pol δ in diploid strains. We find that wild-type Pol ε molecules cannot proofread errors created by proofreading-defective Pol ε molecules, whereas Pol δ can not only proofread errors created by proofreading-defective Pol δ molecules, but can also proofread errors created by Pol ε-defective molecules. These results suggest that any interruption in DNA synthesis on the leading strand is likely to result in completion by Pol δ and also explain the higher mutation rates observed in Pol δ-proofreading mutants compared to Pol ε-proofreading defective mutants. For strains reverting via AT→GC, TA→GC, CG→AT, and GC→AT mutations, we find in addition a strong effect of gene orientation on mutation rate in proofreading-defective strains and demonstrate that much of this orientation dependence is due to differential efficiencies of mispair elongation. We also find that a 3'-terminal 8 oxoG, unlike a 3'-terminal G, is efficiently extended opposite an A and is not subject to proofreading. Proofreading mutations have been shown to result in tumor formation in both mice and humans; the results presented here can help explain the properties exhibited by those proofreading mutants.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationAnimalsDNA, FungalDNA Mismatch RepairDNA Polymerase IIDNA Polymerase IIIEscherichia coliHumansMiceSaccharomyces cerevisiaeDNA, FungalDNA Polymerase IIDNA Polymerase III

Identifiers

PMID25742645
PMCPMC4351087
OpenAlexW2087894832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.