Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25742535›Full record

Trial reportJournal of occupational and environmental medicine2015

Improving employee health: evaluation of a worksite lifestyle change program to decrease risk factors for diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

M Kaye Kramer, Donald M Molenaar, Vincent C Arena, Elizabeth M Venditti, Rebecca J Meehan, Rachel G Miller, Karl K Vanderwood, Yvonne Eaglehouse, Andrea M Kriska

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
19.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Impact of a community-based lifestyle intervention program on health-related quality of life.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2016
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

M Kaye KramerFrom the Department of Epidemiology (Drs Kramer, Kriska, and Vanderwood, Ms Meehan, Ms Miller, and Ms Eaglehouse), University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pa; Department of Medicine (Dr Molenaar), Veterans Health Administration, Minneapolis, Minn; Department of Biostatistics (Dr Arena), University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health; and Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic (Dr Venditti), Pittsburgh, Pa.
Donald M Molenaar
Vincent C Arena
Elizabeth M Venditti
Rebecca J Meehan
Rachel G Miller
Karl K Vanderwood
Yvonne Eaglehouse
Andrea M Kriska
United States Department of Veterans Affairs · USMinistry of Culture · BRUniversity of Pittsburgh · USVeterans Health Administration · US

Funding

Translational Research Training in Cancer Prevention and ControlT32CA186873 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Kathryn H. Schmitz, Jian-Min Yuan · 2014 to 2026
$2.7M
Diabetes Prevention Translation Project: the Healthy LIFESTYLE ProjectR18DK081323 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KRISKA, ANDREA M · 2010 to 2013
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA186873NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK081323NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK081323-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether an evidence-based, behavioral lifestyle intervention program delivered at a worksite setting is effective in improving type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk factors.

methodsA randomized 6-month delayed control design was utilized, with two thirds of the participants assigned to begin intervention immediately, and one third beginning 6 months later. The year-long program (weekly for 3 months transitioning to monthly) focused on weight loss and increasing physical activity.

resultsThe immediate intervention group had greater mean weight loss (-10.4 lb, 5.1%, vs -2.3 lb, 1%; P = 0.0001) than the delayed control group at 6 months and relatively greater improvements in activity, HbA1c, and other risk factors. The delayed group experienced similar improvements after completing the intervention program.

conclusionsA worksite behavioral lifestyle intervention is feasible and effective in significantly improving risk factors for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorLife StyleOccupational HealthOccupational Health ServicesAdultAgedCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ExerciseFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID25742535
PMCPMC4351781
OpenAlexW2068763972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.