Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25742477›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2015

Mitochondrial dysfunction and risk of cancer.

M Lund, M Melbye, L J Diaz, M Duno, J Wohlfahrt, J Vissing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. MYC-an emerging player in mitochondrial diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  5. The BRCT Domain from the Homologue of the Oncogene PES1 inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Role of the mitochondrial stress response in human cancer progression.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2020
    Review
  9. Mitochondria as a possible target for nicotine action.Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes · 2019
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M LundDepartment of Epidemiology Research, National Health Surveillance and Research, Statens Serum Institut, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.
M Melbye1] Department of Epidemiology Research, National Health Surveillance and Research, Statens Serum Institut, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark [2] Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA [3] Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
L J DiazDepartment of Epidemiology Research, National Health Surveillance and Research, Statens Serum Institut, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.
M DunoDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Molecular Genetic Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
J WohlfahrtDepartment of Epidemiology Research, National Health Surveillance and Research, Statens Serum Institut, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.
J VissingCopenhagen Neuromuscular Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMitochondrial mutations are commonly reported in tumours, but it is unclear whether impaired mitochondrial function per se is a cause or consequence of cancer. To elucidate this, we examined the risk of cancer in a nationwide cohort of patients with mitochondrial dysfunction.

methodsWe used nationwide results on genetic testing for mitochondrial disease and the Danish Civil Registration System, to construct a cohort of 311 patients with mitochondrial dysfunction. A total of 177 cohort members were identified from genetic testing and 134 genetically untested cohort members were matrilineal relatives to a cohort member with a genetically confirmed maternally inherited mDNA mutation. Information on cancer was obtained by linkage to the Danish Cancer Register. Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) were used to assess the relative risk of cancer.

resultsDuring 7334 person-years of follow-up, 19 subjects developed a primary cancer. The corresponding SIR for any primary cancer was 1.06 (95% confidence interval 0.68-1.63). Subgroup analyses according to mutational subtype yielded similar results, for example, a SIR of 0.94 (95% CI 0.53 to 1.67) for the m.3243A>G maternally inherited mDNA mutation, cases=13.

conclusionsPatients with mitochondrial dysfunction do not appear to be at increased risk of cancer compared with the general population.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCohort StudiesDNA, MitochondrialFemaleGenetic TestingHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMitochondriaMitochondrial DiseasesMutationNeoplasmsRiskRisk FactorsDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID25742477
PMCPMC4366902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.