Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25742324›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2015

Facial nerve axotomy in mice: a model to study motoneuron response to injury.

Deborah N Olmstead, Nichole A Mesnard-Hoaglin, Richard J Batka, Melissa M Haulcomb, Whitney M Miller, Kathryn J Jones

Open access · bronzeAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Natural Compounds Attenuate Denervation-Induced Skeletal Muscle Atrophy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The MouseFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The p75Acta neuropathologica communications · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Deborah N OlmsteadAnatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine; Research and Development Services, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center.
Nichole A Mesnard-HoaglinDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Illinois, Chicago.
Richard J BatkaAnatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine; Research and Development Services, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center.
Melissa M HaulcombAnatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine; Research and Development Services, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center.
Whitney M MillerAnatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine; Research and Development Services, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center.
Kathryn J JonesAnatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine; Research and Development Services, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center; kjjones1@iupui.edu.
Indiana University · USIndiana University School of MedicineRichard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Immune Regulation of Neuronal Injury and RepairR01NS040433 · NINDS · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI JONES, KATHRYN JANE · 2001 to 2017
$5.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS040433NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS 40433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this surgical protocol is to expose the facial nerve, which innervates the facial musculature, at its exit from the stylomastoid foramen and either cut or crush it to induce peripheral nerve injury. Advantages of this surgery are its simplicity, high reproducibility, and the lack of effect on vital functions or mobility from the subsequent facial paralysis, thus resulting in a relatively mild surgical outcome compared to other nerve injury models. A major advantage of using a cranial nerve injury model is that the motoneurons reside in a relatively homogenous population in the facial motor nucleus in the pons, simplifying the study of the motoneuron cell bodies. Because of the symmetrical nature of facial nerve innervation and the lack of crosstalk between the facial motor nuclei, the operation can be performed unilaterally with the unaxotomized side serving as a paired internal control. A variety of analyses can be performed postoperatively to assess the physiologic response, details of which are beyond the scope of this article. For example, recovery of muscle function can serve as a behavioral marker for reinnervation, or the motoneurons can be quantified to measure cell survival. Additionally, the motoneurons can be accurately captured using laser microdissection for molecular analysis. Because the facial nerve axotomy is minimally invasive and well tolerated, it can be utilized on a wide variety of genetically modified mice. Also, this surgery model can be used to analyze the effectiveness of peripheral nerve injury treatments. Facial nerve injury provides a means for investigating not only motoneurons, but also the responses of the central and peripheral glial microenvironment, immune system, and target musculature. The facial nerve injury model is a widely accepted peripheral nerve injury model that serves as a powerful tool for studying nerve injury and regeneration.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxotomyDisease Models, AnimalFacial NerveFacial Nerve InjuriesFemaleMaleMiceMotor NeuronsNerve Regeneration

Identifiers

PMID25742324
PMCPMC4354671
OpenAlexW1973686641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.