ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2015
Facial nerve axotomy in mice: a model to study motoneuron response to injury.
Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Iba1 deficiency impairs microglial synaptic remodeling and neuronal survival after axonal injury.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Article
- SMILE: neural signal acquisition and intra-body transmission for facial nerve bypass-An acute feasibility study and proof-of-concept in a rat model.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Sensory nerve release of CGRP increases tumor growth in HNSCC by suppressing TILs.Med (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Cellular Sources and Neuroprotective Roles of Interleukin-10 in the Facial Motor Nucleus after Axotomy.Cells · 2022Article
- Profiling Microglia through Single-Cell RNA Sequencing over the Course of Development, Aging, and Disease.Cells · 2022Review
- Facial Nerve Repair: Bioengineering Approaches in Preclinical Models.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2022Review
- Efficacy of LED Photobiomodulation for Functional and Axonal Regeneration After Facial Nerve Section-Suture.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Natural Compounds Attenuate Denervation-Induced Skeletal Muscle Atrophy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Selective Denervation of the Facial Dermato-Muscular Complex in the Rat: Experimental Model and Anatomical Basis.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2021Article
- Neurotrophic effects of dental pulp stem cells on trigeminal neuronal cells.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- CD4+ T cell expression of the IL-10 receptor is necessary for facial motoneuron survival after axotomy.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2020Article
- The MouseFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2020Article
- The Regenerative Potential of Facial Nerve Motoneurons following Chronic Axotomy in Rats.Neural plasticity · 2020Article
- The p75Acta neuropathologica communications · 2019Article
- Optogenetic and transcriptomic interrogation of enhanced muscle function in the paralyzed mouse whisker pad.Journal of neurophysiology · 2019Article
- Valproic Acid Promotes Survival of Facial Motor Neurons in Adult Rats After Facial Nerve Transection: a Pilot Study.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2018Article
- Impact of peripheral immune status on central molecular responses to facial nerve axotomy.Brain, behavior, and immunity · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The goal of this surgical protocol is to expose the facial nerve, which innervates the facial musculature, at its exit from the stylomastoid foramen and either cut or crush it to induce peripheral nerve injury. Advantages of this surgery are its simplicity, high reproducibility, and the lack of effect on vital functions or mobility from the subsequent facial paralysis, thus resulting in a relatively mild surgical outcome compared to other nerve injury models. A major advantage of using a cranial nerve injury model is that the motoneurons reside in a relatively homogenous population in the facial motor nucleus in the pons, simplifying the study of the motoneuron cell bodies. Because of the symmetrical nature of facial nerve innervation and the lack of crosstalk between the facial motor nuclei, the operation can be performed unilaterally with the unaxotomized side serving as a paired internal control. A variety of analyses can be performed postoperatively to assess the physiologic response, details of which are beyond the scope of this article. For example, recovery of muscle function can serve as a behavioral marker for reinnervation, or the motoneurons can be quantified to measure cell survival. Additionally, the motoneurons can be accurately captured using laser microdissection for molecular analysis. Because the facial nerve axotomy is minimally invasive and well tolerated, it can be utilized on a wide variety of genetically modified mice. Also, this surgery model can be used to analyze the effectiveness of peripheral nerve injury treatments. Facial nerve injury provides a means for investigating not only motoneurons, but also the responses of the central and peripheral glial microenvironment, immune system, and target musculature. The facial nerve injury model is a widely accepted peripheral nerve injury model that serves as a powerful tool for studying nerve injury and regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.