Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25742241›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2015

State of the art cranial ultrasound imaging in neonates.

Ginette M Ecury-Goossen, Fleur A Camfferman, Lara M Leijser, Paul Govaert, Jeroen Dudink

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04535375 (Sonographic Quantification of Venous Circulation in the Preterm Brain), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04535375 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Sonographic Quantification of Venous Circulation in the Preterm Brain

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitair Ziekenhuis BrusselRan2021 to 2024Enrolled47ConditionsPrematurity, Extreme, Cerebral Circulatory Failure, Intraventricular HemorrhageArmsDoppler Ultrasound of venous cerebral circulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ginette M Ecury-GoossenDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital.
Fleur A CamffermanDepartment of Radiology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital.
Lara M LeijserDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, UZ Brussel; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Leiden University Medical Center.
Paul GovaertDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Isala Hospital.
Jeroen DudinkDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital; Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital; j.dudink@erasmusmc.nl.
Erasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NLMathys (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cranial ultrasound (CUS) is a reputable tool for brain imaging in critically ill neonates. It is safe, relatively cheap and easy to use, even when a patient is unstable. In addition it is radiation-free and allows serial imaging. CUS possibilities have steadily expanded. However, in many neonatal intensive care units, these possibilities are not optimally used. We present a comprehensive approach for neonatal CUS, focusing on optimal settings, different probes, multiple acoustic windows and Doppler techniques. This approach is suited for both routine clinical practice and research purposes. In a live demonstration, we show how this technique is performed in the neonatal intensive care unit. Using optimal settings and probes allows for better imaging quality and improves the diagnostic value of CUS in experienced hands. Traditionally, images are obtained through the anterior fontanel. Use of supplemental acoustic windows (lambdoid, mastoid, and lateral fontanels) improves detection of brain injury. Adding Doppler studies allows screening of patency of large intracranial arteries and veins. Flow velocities and indices can be obtained. Doppler CUS offers the possibility of detecting cerebral sinovenous thrombosis at an early stage, creating a window for therapeutic intervention prior to thrombosis-induced tissue damage. Equipment, data storage and safety aspects are also addressed.

Indexed as

BrainBrain DiseasesEchoencephalographyHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalUltrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial

Identifiers

PMID25742241
PMCPMC4354604
OpenAlexW2049610259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.