Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25742126›Full record

Observational studyChest2015

Mechanical Ventilation and ARDS in the ED: A Multicenter, Observational, Prospective, Cross-sectional Study.

Brian M Fuller, Nicholas M Mohr, Christopher N Miller, Andrew R Deitchman, Brian J Levine, Nicole Castagno, Elizabeth C Hassebroek, Adam Dhedhi, Nicholas Scott-Wittenborn, Edward Grace and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Chest, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01628523 (Mechanical Ventilation in the Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01628523 completednot on this map

Mechanical Ventilation in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study

TypeobservationalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2012 to 2014Enrolled219ConditionsRespiratory Failure, Mechanical Ventilation, Acute Lung InjuryArmsFor inclusion in the study, patients will have to require mechanical ventilation either via an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy tube.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Management of Mechanical Ventilation in Emergency Medicine: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Emergency medicine clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Observational
  14. An Emergency Amendment to the National Scope of Practice for Paramedics in the Setting of a Global Pandemic.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Brian M FullerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO; Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO. Electronic address: fullerb@wusm.wustl.edu.
Nicholas M MohrDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Christopher N MillerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Andrew R DeitchmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE.
Brian J LevineDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE.
Nicole CastagnoUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.
Elizabeth C HassebroekDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Adam DhedhiSaint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Nicholas Scott-WittenbornWashington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Edward GraceMiddlebury College, Middlebury, VT.
Courtney LehewDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO.
Marin H KollefDivision of Critical Care, and the Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO.
Washington University in St. Louis · USChristiana Care Health System · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMiddlebury College · USSaint Louis University · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesKL2TR000450 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$8.8M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000450NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are few data regarding mechanical ventilation and ARDS in the ED. This could be a vital arena for prevention and treatment.

methodsThis study was a multicenter, observational, prospective, cohort study aimed at analyzing ventilation practices in the ED. The primary outcome was the incidence of ARDS after admission. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the predictors of ARDS.

resultsWe analyzed 219 patients receiving mechanical ventilation to assess ED ventilation practices. Median tidal volume was 7.6 mL/kg predicted body weight (PBW) (interquartile range, 6.9-8.9), with a range of 4.3 to 12.2 mL/kg PBW. Lung-protective ventilation was used in 122 patients (55.7%). The incidence of ARDS after admission from the ED was 14.7%, with a mean onset of 2.3 days. Progression to ARDS was associated with higher illness severity and intubation in the prehospital environment or transferring facility. Of the 15 patients with ARDS in the ED (6.8%), lung-protective ventilation was used in seven (46.7%). Patients who progressed to ARDS experienced greater duration in organ failure and ICU length of stay and higher mortality.

conclusionsLung-protective ventilation is infrequent in patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the ED, regardless of ARDS status. Progression to ARDS is common after admission, occurs early, and worsens outcome. Patient- and treatment-related factors present in the ED are associated with ARDS. Given the limited treatment options for ARDS, and the early onset after admission from the ED, measures to prevent onset and to mitigate severity should be instituted in the ED. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01628523; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDisease ProgressionEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisProspective StudiesRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeRespiratory Insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID25742126
PMCPMC4524326
OpenAlexW1618418865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.