ArticlePloS one2015
Comparative genomics of Cluster O mycobacteriophages.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in mycobacteriophage research: from lytic mechanisms to one health applications.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Characterization of four cluster A1Microbiology resource announcements · 2025Article
- Complete Genome Sequences of Four Mycobacteriophages Involved in Directed Evolution against UndisputedMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Three Cluster O mycobacteriophages isolated in Philadelphia, PA.microPublication biology · 2024Article
- Bacteriophage Taxonomy: A Continually Evolving Discipline.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Virion glycosylation influences mycobacteriophage immune recognition.Cell host & microbe · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Phages Bind to Vegetative and Spore Forms ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Article
- Complete Genome Sequence of Cluster O Mycobacterium smegmatis Bacteriophage Ryadel.Microbiology resource announcements · 2019Article
- Genome Sequence of JangDynasty, a Newly Isolated Mycobacteriophage.Genome announcements · 2018Article
- Tales of diversity: Genomic and morphological characteristics of forty-six Arthrobacter phages.PloS one · 2017Article
- Phages rarely encode antibiotic resistance genes: a cautionary tale for virome analyses.The ISME journal · 2017Article
- Crowdsourced Data Indicate Widespread Multidrug Resistance in Skin Flora of Healthy Young Adults.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2016Article
- Article
- Transcriptomic Characterization of an Infection of Mycobacterium smegmatis by the Cluster A4 Mycobacteriophage Kampy.PloS one · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
55 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Mycobacteriophages--viruses of mycobacterial hosts--are genetically diverse but morphologically are all classified in the Caudovirales with double-stranded DNA and tails. We describe here a group of five closely related mycobacteriophages--Corndog, Catdawg, Dylan, Firecracker, and YungJamal--designated as Cluster O with long flexible tails but with unusual prolate capsids. Proteomic analysis of phage Corndog particles, Catdawg particles, and Corndog-infected cells confirms expression of half of the predicted gene products and indicates a non-canonical mechanism for translation of the Corndog tape measure protein. Bioinformatic analysis identifies 8-9 strongly predicted SigA promoters and all five Cluster O genomes contain more than 30 copies of a 17 bp repeat sequence with dyad symmetry located throughout the genomes. Comparison of the Cluster O phages provides insights into phage genome evolution including the processes of gene flux by horizontal genetic exchange.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.