ReviewThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2015
A review of common tanning methods.
Review in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical Use and Safety of Self-Tanner (Topical Dihydroxyacetone) in Dermatology: A Systematic Review.Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgeryPooled it
- Dual Modulatory Effects of Phytochemicals fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A cross-sectional review of contact allergens in popular self-tanning products.International journal of women's dermatology · 2024Article
- In search of the perfect tan: Chemical activity, biological effects, business considerations, and consumer implications of dihydroxyacetone sunless tanning products.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2023Review
- Comparison of Color Development Kinetics of Tanning Reactions of Dihydroxyacetone with Free and Protected Basic Amino Acids.ACS omega · 2022Article
- A Perspective on Femtosecond Pump-Probe Spectroscopy in the Development of Future Sunscreens.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2022Review
- A hypothesis about the origin of carotenoid lipid droplets in the green algae Dunaliella and Haematococcus.Planta · 2019Review
- Dihydroxyacetone induces G2/M arrest and apoptotic cell death in A375P melanoma cells.Environmental toxicology · 2018Article
- Singlet Oxygen and Free Radical Reactions of Retinoids and Carotenoids-A Review.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tanning in the United States has become an increasingly popular activity in our culture. Tanning methods have evolved through the years to become more readily accessible and easier to use for all consumers, regardless of geographic location. With the rising incidence of skin cancer, the demand for safe and efficient tanning methods remains high. There are currently many different tanning methods being utilized, and still more are being researched. This article serves to summarize some of the most common tarining methods used in the United States today as well as some potential methods currently under study.
Identifiers
25741402PMC4345932What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.