Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25741365›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2015

Identification of copy number variants in whole-genome data using Reference Coverage Profiles.

Gustavo Glusman, Alissa Severson, Varsha Dhankani, Max Robinson, Terry Farrah, Denise E Mauldin, Anna B Stittrich, Seth A Ament, Jared C Roach, Mary E Brunkow and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mutation in an alternative transcript ofCold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Utilization of genomic sequencing for population screening of immunodeficiencies in the newborn.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Big biomedical data as the key resource for discovery science.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Gustavo GlusmanInstitute for Systems Biology Seattle, WA, USA.
Alissa SeversonInstitute for Systems Biology Seattle, WA, USA.
Varsha DhankaniInstitute for Systems Biology Seattle, WA, USA.
Max RobinsonInstitute for Systems Biology Seattle, WA, USA.
Terry FarrahInstitute for Systems Biology Seattle, WA, USA.
Denise E MauldinInstitute for Systems Biology Seattle, WA, USA.
Anna B StittrichInstitute for Systems Biology Seattle, WA, USA.
Seth A AmentInstitute for Systems Biology Seattle, WA, USA.
Jared C RoachInstitute for Systems Biology Seattle, WA, USA.
Mary E BrunkowInstitute for Systems Biology Seattle, WA, USA.
Dale L BodianInova Translational Medicine Institute, Inova Health System Falls Church, VA, USA.
Joseph G VockleyInova Translational Medicine Institute, Inova Health System Falls Church, VA, USA.
Ilya ShmulevichInstitute for Systems Biology Seattle, WA, USA.
John E NiederhuberInova Translational Medicine Institute, Inova Health System Falls Church, VA, USA.
Leroy HoodInstitute for Systems Biology Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Quantitative Systems BiologyP50GM076547 · NIGMS · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI DUDLEY, AIMEE M · 2006 to 2016
$30.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM076547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of DNA copy numbers from short-read sequencing data remains a challenge for both technical and algorithmic reasons. The raw data for these analyses are measured in tens to hundreds of gigabytes per genome; transmitting, storing, and analyzing such large files is cumbersome, particularly for methods that analyze several samples simultaneously. We developed a very efficient representation of depth of coverage (150-1000× compression) that enables such analyses. Current methods for analyzing variants in whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data frequently miss copy number variants (CNVs), particularly hemizygous deletions in the 1-100 kb range. To fill this gap, we developed a method to identify CNVs in individual genomes, based on comparison to joint profiles pre-computed from a large set of genomes. We analyzed depth of coverage in over 6000 high quality (>40×) genomes. The depth of coverage has strong sequence-specific fluctuations only partially explained by global parameters like %GC. To account for these fluctuations, we constructed multi-genome profiles representing the observed or inferred diploid depth of coverage at each position along the genome. These Reference Coverage Profiles (RCPs) take into account the diverse technologies and pipeline versions used. Normalization of the scaled coverage to the RCP followed by hidden Markov model (HMM) segmentation enables efficient detection of CNVs and large deletions in individual genomes. Use of pre-computed multi-genome coverage profiles improves our ability to analyze each individual genome. We make available RCPs and tools for performing these analyses on personal genomes. We expect the increased sensitivity and specificity for individual genome analysis to be critical for achieving clinical-grade genome interpretation.

Indexed as

clinical genomicsdepth of coveragesignal processingstructural variationwhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID25741365
PMCPMC4330915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.