Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25741361›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2015

Social parasitism and the molecular basis of phenotypic evolution.

Alessandro Cini, Solenn Patalano, Anne Segonds-Pichon, George B J Busby, Rita Cervo, Seirian Sumner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Inquiline social parasites as tools to unlock the secrets of insect sociality.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  6. Ant behaviour and brain gene expression of defending hosts depend on the ecological success of the intruding social parasite.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Genomes of the Hymenoptera.Current opinion in insect science · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Limited social plasticity in the socially polymorphic sweat beeBehavioral ecology and sociobiology · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alessandro CiniDipartimento di Biologia, Università di Firenze Firenze, Italy.
Solenn PatalanoInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London London, UK ; The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus - Cambridge Cambridge, UK.
Anne Segonds-PichonThe Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus - Cambridge Cambridge, UK.
George B J BusbyInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London London, UK ; Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics Oxford, UK.
Rita CervoDipartimento di Biologia, Università di Firenze Firenze, Italy.
Seirian SumnerInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London London, UK ; School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol Bristol, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contrasting phenotypes arise from similar genomes through a combination of losses, gains, co-option and modifications of inherited genomic material. Understanding the molecular basis of this phenotypic diversity is a fundamental challenge in modern evolutionary biology. Comparisons of the genes and their expression patterns underlying traits in closely related species offer an unrivaled opportunity to evaluate the extent to which genomic material is reorganized to produce novel traits. Advances in molecular methods now allow us to dissect the molecular machinery underlying phenotypic diversity in almost any organism, from single-celled entities to the most complex vertebrates. Here we discuss how comparisons of social parasites and their free-living hosts may provide unique insights into the molecular basis of phenotypic evolution. Social parasites evolve from a eusocial ancestor and are specialized to exploit the socially acquired resources of their closely-related eusocial host. Molecular comparisons of such species pairs can reveal how genomic material is re-organized in the loss of ancestral traits (i.e., of free-living traits in the parasites) and the gain of new ones (i.e., specialist traits required for a parasitic lifestyle). We define hypotheses on the molecular basis of phenotypes in the evolution of social parasitism and discuss their wider application in our understanding of the molecular basis of phenotypic diversity within the theoretical framework of phenotypic plasticity and shifting reaction norms. Currently there are no data available to test these hypotheses, and so we also provide some proof of concept data using the paper wasp social parasite/host system (Polistes sulcifer-Polistes dominula). This conceptual framework and first empirical data provide a spring-board for directing future genomic analyses on exploiting social parasites as a route to understanding the evolution of phenotypic specialization.

Indexed as

gene expressiongenomicsphenotypic plasticityPolistessocial insectssocial parasites

Identifiers

PMID25741361
PMCPMC4332356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.