Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25741350›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2015

Phospholipase D affects translocation of NPR1 to the nucleus in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Martin Janda, Vladimír Šašek, Hana Chmelařová, Jan Andrejch, Miroslava Nováková, Jana Hajšlová, Lenka Burketová, Olga Valentová

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Phosphatidic acid signaling and function in nuclei.Progress in lipid research · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Proteomic Analysis of ArabidopsisFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  9. Shot-Gun Proteomic Analysis on Roots of ArabidopsisInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martin JandaDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague Prague, Czech Republic ; Laboratory of Pathological Plant Physiology, Institute of Experimental Botany AS CR Prague, Czech Republic.
Vladimír ŠašekLaboratory of Pathological Plant Physiology, Institute of Experimental Botany AS CR Prague, Czech Republic.
Hana ChmelařováDepartment of Food Analysis and Nutrition, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan AndrejchDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague Prague, Czech Republic.
Miroslava NovákováDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague Prague, Czech Republic ; Laboratory of Pathological Plant Physiology, Institute of Experimental Botany AS CR Prague, Czech Republic.
Jana HajšlováDepartment of Food Analysis and Nutrition, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague Prague, Czech Republic.
Lenka BurketováLaboratory of Pathological Plant Physiology, Institute of Experimental Botany AS CR Prague, Czech Republic.
Olga ValentováDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague Prague, Czech Republic.
University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Botany · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytohormone salicylic acid (SA) is a crucial component of plant-induced defense against biotrophic pathogens. Although the key players of the SA pathway are known, there are still gaps in the understanding of the molecular mechanism and the regulation of particular steps. In our previous research, we showed in Arabidopsis suspension cells that n-butanol, which specifically modulates phospholipase D activity, significantly suppresses the transcription of the pathogenesis related (PR-1) gene, which is generally accepted as the SA pathway marker. In the presented study, we have investigated the site of n-butanol action in the SA pathway. We were able to show in Arabidopsis plants treated with SA that n-butanol inhibits the transcription of defense genes (PR-1, WRKY38). Fluorescence microscopy of Arabidopsis thaliana mutants expressing 35S::NPR1-GFP (nonexpressor pathogenesis related 1) revealed significantly decreased nuclear localization of NPR1 in the presence of n-butanol. On the other hand, n-butanol did not decrease the nuclear localization of NPR1 in 35S::npr1C82A-GFP and 35S::npr1C216A-GFP mutants constitutively expressing NPR1 monomers. Mass spectrometric analysis of plant extracts showed that n-butanol significantly changes the metabolic fingerprinting while t-butanol had no effect. We found groups of the plant metabolites, influenced differently by SA and n-butanol treatment. Thus, we proposed several metabolites as markers for n-butanol action.

Indexed as

metabolomen-butanolNPR1phospholipase DPR-1salicylic acidsignaling

Identifiers

PMID25741350
PMCPMC4332306
OpenAlexW2029224547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.