Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25740892›Full record

ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2015

An out-of-body experience: the extracellular dimension for the transmission of mutualistic bacteria in insects.

Hassan Salem, Laura Florez, Nicole Gerardo, Martin Kaltenpoth

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 170 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
170citing papers in PubMed
26.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

170 citing papers in PubMed, 335 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Fidelity in co-diversified symbiosis.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A New Classification Framework to Understand Evolutionary Transitions in Individuality.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  20. Article

110 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hassan SalemInsect Symbiosis Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany hsalem@ice.mpg.de.
Laura FlorezInsect Symbiosis Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Nicole GerardoDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Martin KaltenpothInsect Symbiosis Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany mkaltenpoth@ice.mpg.de.
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology · DEEmory University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across animals and plants, numerous metabolic and defensive adaptations are a direct consequence of symbiotic associations with beneficial microbes. Explaining how these partnerships are maintained through evolutionary time remains one of the central challenges within the field of symbiosis research. While genome erosion and co-cladogenesis with the host are well-established features of symbionts exhibiting intracellular localization and transmission, the ecological and evolutionary consequences of an extracellular lifestyle have received little attention, despite a demonstrated prevalence and functional importance across many host taxa. Using insect-bacteria symbioses as a model, we highlight the diverse routes of extracellular symbiont transfer. Extracellular transmission routes are unified by the common ability of the bacterial partners to survive outside their hosts, thereby imposing different genomic, metabolic and morphological constraints than would be expected from a strictly intracellular lifestyle. We emphasize that the evolutionary implications of symbiont transmission routes (intracellular versus extracellular) do not necessarily correspond to those of the transmission mode (vertical versus horizontal), a distinction of vital significance when addressing the genomic and physiological consequences for both host and symbiont.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaBiological EvolutionSymbiosisAnimalsBacteriaInsectahost–microbe coevolutionmutualism stabilitysymbiont transmissionsymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID25740892
PMCPMC4375872
OpenAlexW2080445538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.