Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25740888›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2015

Broad supernatural punishment but not moralizing high gods precede the evolution of political complexity in Austronesia.

Joseph Watts, Simon J Greenhill, Quentin D Atkinson, Thomas E Currie, Joseph Bulbulia, Russell D Gray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. From Text to Thought: How Analyzing Language Can Advance Psychological Science.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Cultural similarity among coreligionists within and between countries.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Historical, archaeological and linguistic evidence test the phylogenetic inference of Viking-Age plant use.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  13. The uses and abuses of tree thinking in cultural evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joseph WattsSchool of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand me@josephwatts.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7737-273X
Simon J GreenhillSchool of Culture, History and Language, ANU College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia ARC Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7832-6156
Quentin D AtkinsonSchool of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Kahlaische Strasse 10, Jena 07745, Germany.
Thomas E CurrieDepartment of Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Cornwall TR10 9EZ, UK.
Joseph BulbuliaSchool of Art History, Classics and Religious Studies, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6012, New Zealand.
Russell D GraySchool of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Kahlaische Strasse 10, Jena 07745, Germany Research School of the Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supernatural belief presents an explanatory challenge to evolutionary theorists-it is both costly and prevalent. One influential functional explanation claims that the imagined threat of supernatural punishment can suppress selfishness and enhance cooperation. Specifically, morally concerned supreme deities or 'moralizing high gods' have been argued to reduce free-riding in large social groups, enabling believers to build the kind of complex societies that define modern humanity. Previous cross-cultural studies claiming to support the MHG hypothesis rely on correlational analyses only and do not correct for the statistical non-independence of sampled cultures. Here we use a Bayesian phylogenetic approach with a sample of 96 Austronesian cultures to test the MHG hypothesis as well as an alternative supernatural punishment hypothesis that allows punishment by a broad range of moralizing agents. We find evidence that broad supernatural punishment drives political complexity, whereas MHGs follow political complexity. We suggest that the concept of MHGs diffused as part of a suite of traits arising from cultural exchange between complex societies. Our results show the power of phylogenetic methods to address long-standing debates about the origins and functions of religion in human society.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonCultural EvolutionMoralsPunishmentReligionAsia, SoutheasternAustralasiaBayes TheoremHumansPhylogenycultural evolutionevolution of religionphylogeneticspolitical complexitysocial complexitysupernatural punishment

Identifiers

PMID25740888
PMCPMC4375858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.