Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25740775›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2015

Improved diagnosis of orthopedic implant-associated infection by inoculation of sonication fluid into blood culture bottles.

María Eugenia Portillo, Margarita Salvadó, Andrej Trampuz, Ana Siverio, Albert Alier, Lluisa Sorli, Santos Martínez, Daniel Pérez-Prieto, Juan P Horcajada, Lluis Puig-Verdie

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

María Eugenia PortilloMicrobiology Laboratory, Reference Laboratory of Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain Center for Septic Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany portillobordonabe@gmail.com.
Margarita SalvadóMicrobiology Laboratory, Reference Laboratory of Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Andrej TrampuzCenter for Septic Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ana SiverioMicrobiology Laboratory, Reference Laboratory of Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Albert AlierDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Lluisa SorliInfectious Diseases, Hospital del Mar, Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
Santos MartínezDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Daniel Pérez-PrietoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Juan P HorcajadaInfectious Diseases, Hospital del Mar, Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
Lluis Puig-VerdieDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Hospital Del Mar · ESCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sonication improved the diagnosis of orthopedic implant-associated infections (OIAI). We investigated the diagnostic performance of sonication fluid inoculated into blood culture bottles in comparison with that of intraoperative tissue and sonication fluid cultures. Consecutive patients with removed orthopedic hardware were prospectively included and classified as having OIAI or aseptic failure (AF) according to standardized criteria. The diagnostic procedure included the collection of five intraoperative tissue cultures and sonication of the removed device, followed by conventional culture of the sonication fluid. Cultures were incubated for 7 days (aerobic) or 14 days (anaerobic). In addition, 10 ml of sonication fluid was inoculated into each aerobic and anaerobic BacT/Alert FAN blood culture bottle and incubated in the automated blood culture system for 5 days. Of 75 included patients, 39 had OIAI and 36 AF. The sensitivity of sonication fluid inoculated into blood culture bottles (100%) was higher than that of conventional sonication fluid (87%; P = 0.05) or intraoperative tissue cultures (59%; P < 0.01). Previous antibiotic therapy reduced the culture sensitivity of conventional sonication fluid to 77% and that of intraoperative tissue to 55%, while it remained 100% for blood culture-inoculated sonication fluid. The time to positivity was shorter in blood culture-inoculated sonication fluid, with detection of 72% of microorganisms after 1 day of incubation, than for intraoperative tissue and conventional sonication fluid cultures, with detection of 18% and 28% of microorganisms, respectively. In conclusion, compared to conventional sonication fluid and intraoperative tissue cultures, sonication fluid inoculated into blood culture bottles improved the diagnosis of OIAI and considerably reduced the time to culture positivity.

Indexed as

SonicationAdultAerobiosisAgedAged, 80 and overAnaerobiosisFemaleHumansMaleMicrobiological TechniquesMiddle AgedOrthopedic ProceduresProstheses and ImplantsProsthesis-Related InfectionsSensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen Handling

Identifiers

PMID25740775
PMCPMC4400755
OpenAlexW2145939393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.