ArticleJournal of neurology2015
Influence of neurologists' experience on the outcome of patients treated by intravenous thrombolysis for cerebral ischaemia.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intravenous (i.v.) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) should be available on a 24/7 basis in hospitals admitting patients with stroke. We aimed at evaluating the influence of the number of patients previously treated with i.v. rt-PA by neurologists on patients' outcome. For each patient consecutively treated with i.v. rt-PA for cerebral ischaemia at the Lille University Hospital, we determined the number of previous treatments with rt-PA administered by the neurologist. We performed logistic regression analyses to determine the influence of the experience on the outcome evaluated by the modified Rankin scale (mRS) after 3 months, 0-1 meaning independence, and 0-2 meaning absence of handicap. We compared outcomes of patients treated by the 25% less experienced neurologists with those of trials. Forty-four neurologists treated 800 patients. The experience of the treating neurologist was independently associated with independence (adjusted odds ratio [(adj)OR] 1.062 for 10 patients more; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.008-1.120), and absence of handicap ((adj)OR 1.076 for 10 patients more; 95%CI 1.016-1.140) at 3 months, but not with symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage and death. The proportions of patients from the 1st quartile who were independent and without handicap at 3 months were 37.9 and 51.1%. Patients treated by less experienced neurologists, have similar outcomes than expected from trials, suggesting they benefit from thrombolysis. However, the outcome of patients treated by more experienced neurologists was slightly better. Less experienced neurologists should not be excluded from rt-PA programmes, but their practices should be evaluated and educational programmes organised.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.