Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25740660›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of public health2015

The challenge of compiling data profiles to stimulate local preventive health action: a European case study from child safety.

Denise Alexander, Michael Rigby, Mika Gissler, Lennart Köhler, Morag MacKay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Denise AlexanderDepartment of International Health, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands, denise.alexander@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Michael Rigby
Mika Gissler
Lennart Köhler
Morag MacKay

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPositive recent experience of presenting comparative child safety data at national level has instigated policy action in Europe. It was hoped a Child Safety Index could quantify how safe a community, region or locality is for its children in comparison with similar areas within Europe, as a focus for local targeted action.

methodsValidated indicators proposed by previous European projects identified from areas of child injury prevention, such as road safety, burns or poisoning, were selected to give a balanced profile, and populated from available published data. An index using a sub-score for each specific injury topic was proposed. The indicators' presentation, sensitivity and appropriateness were considered, as well as data availability.

resultsSatisfactory indicators were not identified for all areas and very few local area data were available. This forced the researchers to conclude that at present, constructing a reliable Child Safety Index for use at the local level is not feasible.

conclusionsThere is a worrying lack of data available at the sub-national level to support injury prevention, evaluate interventions, and enable informed local decision making.

Indexed as

Accident PreventionAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolEuropeGlobal HealthHealth EducationHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPrimary PreventionProgram EvaluationRisk FactorsSafetyTrauma Severity IndicesWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID25740660
PMCPMC4555205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.