ReviewSurgical endoscopy2015
Partial splenectomy in the era of minimally invasive surgery: the current laparoscopic and robotic experiences.
Review in Surgical endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robotic partial splenectomy: a new standardized approach.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Comparing laparoscopic and robotic splenectomy: A systematic review of the outcomes.Journal of minimal access surgery · 2026Article
- A novel three-block method for laparoscopic partial splenectomy: improved spleen preservation and reduced complications.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- Robot-assisted partial splenectomy for benign splenic tumors: Four case reports.World journal of clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Exploring the potential role for extended reality in Mohs micrographic surgery.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Review
- Laparoscopic anatomical partial splenectomy for extremely rare isolated splenic lymphangioma in an adult: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Robot-assisted resection of benign splenic tumors in children.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Article
- Distal pancreatectomy with partial preservation of the spleen: a new surgical technique.Gland surgery · 2023Article
- Gene Editing of Primary Rhesus Macaque B Cells.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2023Article
- Super-Selective Partial Splenic Embolization for Hereditary Spherocytosis in Children: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Laparoscopic partial splenectomy with temporary occlusion of the trunk of the splenic artery in fifty-one cases: experience at a single center.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Laparoscopic partial splenectomy for splenic lymphangioma: a case report.Surgical case reports · 2020Article
- Laparoscopic hemi-splenectomy: a valid option in selected cases such as epidermoid cyst.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2019Article
- Splenic trauma in the twenty-first century: changing trends in management.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2018Article
- Partial splenectomy: A case series and systematic review of the literature.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2018Article
- Article
- Robotic splenectomy with ex vivo bench surgery and hemi-spleen autotransplant: the first report.Journal of robotic surgery · 2017Article
- Partial Splenectomy is Superior to Total Splenectomy for Selected Patients with Hemangiomas or Cysts.World journal of surgery · 2017Article
- Recent Development of Augmented Reality in Surgery: A Review.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPartial splenectomy (PS) is a spleen-preserving technique that is applied as a result of trauma, focal lesions or hematological conditions. Despite the improvement of laparoscopic techniques within the past several decades, minimally invasive PS has remained a marginal technique that has not been well evaluated. Our objective was to provide an update on the indications and the feasibility of this procedure.
methodsThe MEDLINE database (PubMed) was searched, and all relevant articles that involved a true minimally invasive PS (i.e., segmental or lobar devascularization of the spleen with parenchymal transection) were included. The search was conducted until the 31st of March 2014. Demographic data, operative indications, estimated blood losses, operative times, conversion rates and complications were extracted from the included articles and were summarized for discussion.
resultsOut of the 195 publications that were retrieved, 33 were included, which were mainly case reports and case series that represented a total of 187 patients. There were 37 men, 33 women and 117 patients of unknown gender. The mean age of the patients was ranged from 6 to 58 years. The mean total operative time was between 70 and 216 min for conventional laparoscopy and between 108 and 120 min for the robotic approach. For most studies, the mean estimated blood loss was minimal. The complication rate was 5.36% for conventional laparoscopy and 5.56% for the robotic approach.
conclusionThe outcomes of minimally invasive PS were favorable and comparable to those of the open technique according to the literature. This procedure may constitute an attractive alternative to the open technique for selected cases. Moreover, a robotic approach might be an interesting technical option, but additional research is needed before any definitive conclusions can be drawn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25740639What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.